patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

300 Strongsville Teachers Swarm School Board Meeting: Updated

Union sends an apparent message of solidarity, expresses frustration over contract talks

 

 

An estimated 300 Strongsville teachers made an organized appearance at a School Board meeting Thursday night to send an apparent message of solidarity in the midst of contract talks.

None spoke during the meeting, and all of the teachers approached afterward refused to answer any questions.

The group gathered in the parking lot at Strongsville High School and waited until the board meeting had been under way for about five minutes, then entered in a long line.

They stood in the back of the meeting room for about 20 minutes, then filed out around 7:25 p.m., five minutes before the meeting ended.

The school board continued its regular business without interruption.

Tracy Linscott, president of the Strongsville Education Association, said in an email that the teachers attended the meeting "in order to demonstrate our frustration with the lack of progress in negotiations."

Superintendent John Krupinski said after the meeting the district has had about four meetings with the teachers' union since the school year started.

"I think the last meeting we had (Jan. 9) was productive," Krupinski said. "We had a very positive meeting."

More contract talks are slated for this month -- tentatively Jan. 28 -- and in February, he said.

The last round of teacher contract negotiations lasted nine months and ended with a two-year deal that included a salary freeze and no step pay increases for the 2011-12 school year.

That deal, finalized in March 2011, saved the district about $2 million, officials said. It also called for teachers to take on extra duties during the school day and to contribute more to their health insurance costs.

The contract was retroactive to Aug. 1, 2010 and expired June 30, 2012.

During those talks, teachers made at least one similar organized appearance at a meeting.

Krupinski said the district is now in a better financial situation in some ways, but is still facing fiscal uncertainty.

"We're certainly not rich," he said. "We do have deficits (projected) in outlying years."

The district made significant budget reductions in 2011, but voter approval of a 6-mill renewal levy in March 2012 thwarted deeper cuts to busing, athletics and other programs.

The district has been able to stop taking cash advances to meet its monthly expenses.

But Krupinski said revenue is still declining and the impact of the state's new funding formula is unknown.

He called contract negotiations "a process" and indicated the show of solidarity would not impact the administration's position on the talks in either direction.

"They (teachers) have every right to come to an open meeting," he said.

Related Topics: contract talks strongsville, strongsville schools, strongsville teachers, teacher contract strongsville, and teacher negotiations

Jean Williams

1:14 pm on Friday, January 18, 2013

interesting footage !!! one of those teachers I looked up what their pay was in 2011
http://buckeyeinstitute.org/teacher-salary
Salary $80,869.00
hours per day 7.50
days worked 184 which is 1350 hours per year
pro-rate their pay to a normal 2080 hour work year it is $124,598.00
3 year employer salary match 33968.00
pension 53,373.00
lets not even start with how little they pay in health care

just to save the standard reply "teachers work many hours at home on their lesson plan" Ok
lets give a teacher credit for 10 hours work per day by those 184 days so 184 X 10 = 1840 hours which is $ 80860 and divide by 1840 and you get $ 43.90 per hour worked in 9 months (free to work all summer)

Thank you for putting faces on those who feel underpaid

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jean Williams

1:21 pm on Friday, January 18, 2013

just to be clear I did not pick this one teacher out just because of the "HIGH" salary there is over 150 other Strongsville teachers making between 78,000.00 and 81,000.00 per 9 months work

Comment_arrow

lyn

4:53 pm on Friday, January 18, 2013

And, hasn't the district been paying the teachers 10% pension contribution for them? So, add 10% to that salary for a more realistic figure of what they are paid.
I'm sure the board was shaking in their boots when they marched in.
But, I hope the board remembers they work for the taxpayers and for the benefit of the students - not the teachers. When a private company encounters tough times, its the employees who are first to feel the pain. So, schools should be no different.

Comment_arrow

John

7:15 am on Saturday, January 19, 2013

I'm betting you don't know a single teacher, because your assumptions are way off. Teachers don't just work the classroom hours (the 7.5 hours/day figure) during the work week; they also spend plenty of hours preparing for classes, grading papers, doing required paperwork, meeting with parents, responding to parents via calls/e-mails, etc. It is not an easy job.

You also float the $80,000 figure as though it is a typical teacher salary. I happen to have a good friend who has taught in a local school district for several years, and his salary is a little more than half of the figure you quote. That $80,000 number would be for a senior teacher with 20+ years in the classroom. That's really not that much money; compare that salary to professionals in other fields with advanced degrees and similar experience.

That's the problem with a site like Buckeye Institute. Self-appointed watchdogs can access the data and mis-interpret it to fit their own agendas. But yeah, keep pinning society's problems on those eeeevil teachers and their limitless greed.

Comment_arrow

Jean Williams

12:22 pm on Saturday, January 19, 2013

john that means Strongsville has over 150 "senior" teachers all making 80,000 + a year, what I do find funny is anytime teachers salaries are brought up, somebody always seems to post about a "friend" they know who only makes 1/2 that amount

Comment_arrow

John

8:30 am on Sunday, January 20, 2013

Actually, Jean, it means that Strongsville schools have 150 employees total making $80,000 per year -- including principals, assistant principals, counselors, etc. (That's assuming the data reflects just salary, and I have my doubts.)

As for the $40,000 comment: I'm not going to post his name here, but yes, I do have a friend who has taught in a local school system for about 6-7 years, and he is now in the upper $40,000 range. Believe it, don't believe it, I don't care. I know the truth.

Anyway, if you have a problem living in a school district that likes to hire and retain good teachers, maybe you should move. If you'd like to live in a community that constantly votes down school levies and keeps expenses down, perhaps you should try my childhood town of Parma. Voting no on all those levies has increased property values, attracted better educated and more affluent families, and made the city a shining beacon admired by all. Oh wait, that's right, the exact opposite happened. The city went in the toilet, thanks to selfish people who grumbled (just like you) at every turn about how those damn schools kept wasting what money they had.

Comment_arrow

Jean Williams

11:16 am on Sunday, January 20, 2013

no John I left the principals, assistant principals, counselors, etc. out of that 80,000 figure since they make more, and my complaint is not the salary amount it is the "freebies " that we the taxpayers have to pickup in addition to their salaries

its always good to see yet another post about someones "friend" --------- but yes, I do have a friend who has taught in a local school system for about 6-7 years, and he is now in the upper $40,000 range

Nick Danger

7:20 pm on Friday, January 18, 2013

Just keep in mind that prior to this recession, nobody cared about teachers' salaries. During those better economic times, it was perfectly acceptable for an auto worker or a steel worker to make more than teachers. No one complained about that. Collectively, teachers survived the recession much better than workers in other industries. Simply because they didn't get hurt by unemployment and detriorating wages, they have become an easy target for criticism and jealosy. Finally, that $80,000 annual teacher's salary is incorrect.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Brian

9:38 pm on Friday, January 18, 2013

Yeah, buckeye institute is definitely not accurate. I was just looking at the payroll from my old district; they still list the high school principal from when I was there, and he left the district years ago.

Comment_arrow

tom m

10:07 pm on Friday, January 18, 2013

Brian you are a teacher and you cannot use the filters in the search feature to exclude previous years ..............that speaks volumes

Comment_arrow

Brian

8:31 am on Saturday, January 19, 2013

No I'm not a teacher. The example I was using was Brian Wilch who used to be the principal of Brecksville-Broadview Heights High School. You can go ahead and look it up on buckeye institute site. They claim he was receiving a salary every year from 2004 to 2011. However, per this article (http://blog.cleveland.com/suncourier/2009/07/brian_wilch_ready_to_leave_bre.html) you can see that he clearly opted out of his contract in 2009.

Tina

4:22 pm on Saturday, January 19, 2013

I'm really tired of hearing how little teachers work. Where is it that you have learned all this wisdom Jean? Do YOU know any teachers? You seem quite bitter about them. You neglect to mention weekends as well as the out-of-pocket money for classroom expenses. If you think it is such a cake job, why don't you come and sub for me for I day? I'll even stay in the room and make sure the kids behave for you. I don't work in Strongsville, but I don't begrudge my daughters' teachers the salaries they make. I know how hard they work, and I know that their work directly impacts the quality of education in the city of Strongsville. . Why don't you read this book? http://www.amazon.com/Like-Apologize-Every-Teacher-ebook/dp/B007UH4HSW/ref=dp_kinw_strp_1
Tony Danza taught ONE class a day. You seriously think $43 an hour is too much? Then please move to a shitty city where they don't care about education. You can sit back and watch the city implode. Good teachers=good schools. Good schools=good neighborhoods. Good neighborhoods=good housing values.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jean Williams

7:29 pm on Saturday, January 19, 2013

its good that Tina has a mommy who still fights her battles for her ..............news scoop Tina your daughter works for me, and your daughter needs to contribute her fair share, I have yet to see one teacher ever post why they think they deserve a pay increase in a down economy

Matt Rubic

9:57 pm on Saturday, January 19, 2013

Ease up Jean. Nobody here, besides yourself, wants to hear it.

Reply

Tina Lewis Kozarik

11:33 pm on Saturday, January 19, 2013

I wish their interest in school board meetings wasn't just when they're in contract negotiations.

Reply

Kathy Hanson

10:38 am on Sunday, January 20, 2013

Simple Math...........5 classes + 2 academic assist classes with an average of 25 students X $2.00 an hour for ummmm babysitting = that's $100 an hour X 6 = $600 daily x 184 days = c.$110,000 yearly…....40 minutes to collaborate with fellow colleagues about curriculum, student learning objectives, plan interventions to maximize student learning with regard to students’ personal, and academic issues that effects learning……..30 minutes to eat lunch and 40 plan minutes to: talk to parents, grade papers, plan meaningful, state standard, motivating, inspiring, core standard related, daily lesson plans, check school email, talk with school administrators concerning school and student issues, conference with students who need personal and academic help, and keep up on the last innovations in education. AND we DON’T babysit !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (c. = approximately)

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jean Williams

11:08 am on Sunday, January 20, 2013

Kathy you wrote "25 students X $2.00 an hour for ummmm babysitting = that's $100 an hour X 6 = $600 daily"
it is simple math 25 students X $2.00 an hour IS $50.00 an hour x 6 + $300 daily x 184 days = $55,000.00 DEAL thanks for the new teachers contract
and your a teacher ?????

Melissa

12:00 pm on Sunday, January 20, 2013

Jean, it's "you're a teacher" not "your a teacher" as you wrote in your previous comment. Maybe you were too busy correcting and judging everyone else to realize YOUR mistake? Also, can you please tell me what occupations deserve to make more money than teachers? I am very curious to hear YOUR educated opinions.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Kim L

1:07 pm on Sunday, January 20, 2013

again I will answer that question on which occupations deserve to make more than teachers.
all police and firefighters all nurses and EMS.
Melissa how about lets just make the benefit packages and how much all these occupations contribute to their healthcare and retirement packages all be the same.

Comment_arrow

James Murphy

1:47 pm on Sunday, January 20, 2013

Melissa there is a term "spelling nazi" look it up and see if YOUR picture is next to it

kenneth malady

4:56 pm on Sunday, January 20, 2013

We still haven't heard what you do for a living Jean Williams !!! I agree with Holly !! How about letting us know what YOU do for a living ???

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jean Williams

11:02 pm on Sunday, January 20, 2013

Kenneth I will answer that in terms that you should be able to understand.
My job is to work everyday and pay the taxes that funds the teachers salary and healthcare/ pension packages. And I am saying MY TAX DOLLAR FUNDED EMPLOYEES (the teachers) need to contribute more until the economy picks back up again, which will allow more of my neighbors to find jobs and help out with the tax generation >>>>>>>was that simple enough for you

Comment_arrow

tom m

2:57 am on Monday, January 21, 2013

Jean very well put .................I am waiting for a Strongsville teacher to come on here and post WHY they think they should get a raise

Comment_arrow

lyn

7:50 am on Monday, January 21, 2013

Jean and tom - Good answers!

lyn

4:57 pm on Sunday, January 20, 2013

Nick Danger-
In response to your comments:
-"prior to this recession, nobody cared about teachers' salaries" - NO, people have always been concerned about the teachers salaries and benefits
-" it was perfectly acceptable for an auto worker or a steel worker to make more than teachers. No one complained about that." - NOT an issue, as WE the taxpayers pay the teachers salaries and benefits, no choice; auto company employees are not paid by the taxpayers - you don't like it, don't buy a car
-"teachers survived the recession much better than workers in other industries"-because there is a big difference in working as a public employee and private employee - guess which job gets protected? The one WE pay for!
-"they have become an easy target for criticism and jealosy"- NO, its just they should be more in line with everyone else, including other public employees salaries and benefits
-" Finally, that $80,000 annual teacher's salary is incorrect."- You are right. You need to add in the 10 % we the taxpayers paid toward their retirement. Make that a net $88,000.

Reply

lyn

5:15 pm on Sunday, January 20, 2013

Kenneth and Holly -
What a ridiculous comeback.
Can't justify the teachers salary any other way?
Why aren't you questioning how the teachers salary compares to adjoining cities or other public employees, like police and fire who risk their lives?
Why aren't you questioning why we had to pay their share of retirement contribution like most district teachers do? Or like people in the private sector do, they pay into social security - but our teachers were given a break, I guess you could say partially in lieu of some salary increases, but that is really what it was.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Buster Chops

11:23 am on Sunday, January 27, 2013

Lyn,
I retired into STRS nearly 10 years ago. During my career, which many have called 'exemplary', I had the opportunity to teach at several public and private colleges - jobs at which I paid Social Security contributions. For the last nine years I have been quite gainfully employed by a private company that is benefiting from the expertise I bring to their endeavors. During that time I have been paying Social Security taxes that I will never collect because of my state retirement. I was an attractive candidate to my employer because they needed people with the skill sets that I developed as a teacher. As such, I have been making far more money for the company than they pay me, and probably far less than I am worth. Why? Because without a public education system I would have nothing - no education; no career. Instead, the surplus I bring in helps to pay the salaries of other people, and my SS contributions will go far to help people that I don't even know live better lives.

You are just bitter over the fact that you are a selfish person who would rather complain about people who deserve to get paid well for trying to ensure that schools produce fewer miserable people like the haters on this board.

Whatever YOU have in life - thank a teacher - you obviously can't do things well by yourself.

Comment_arrow

lyn

1:43 pm on Sunday, January 27, 2013

Buster-
WOW! Talk about being bitter! All I want is fairness and the teachers to be paid a decent wage and for benefits similar to the community they live in. They should not be putting their community in a position of having to support them to a better salary and benefits than they are struggling to have. Especially bad when it takes a little over ONE household to support ONE teacher's salary, and that doesn't even begin to cover benefits.

Comment_arrow

lyn

1:56 pm on Sunday, January 27, 2013

And, Buster,
Care to explain to the readers why you say you will not get social security? As per STRS:

The Windfall Elimination Provision affects how your Social Security retirement or disability benefits are calculated if you are also entitled to receive a pension benefit for work not covered by Social Security. While your Social Security benefits are lowered under the WEP, they cannot be totally eliminated.

Per the SS website:

If you work for an employer who does not withhold Social Security taxes from your salary, such as a government agency or an employer in another country, any ­pension you get based on that work may reduce your Social Security benefits.
The Windfall Elimination Provision affects how the amount of your retirement or disability benefit is calculated if you receive a pension from work where Social Security taxes were not taken out of your pay. A modified formula is used to calculate your benefit amount, resulting in a lower Social Security ­benefit than you otherwise would receive.
...The Windfall Elimination Provision primarily affects you if you earned a pension in any job where you did not pay Social Security taxes and you also worked in other jobs long enough to qualify for a Social Security retirement or disability benefit."

I taking a liking to its name "The Windfall Elimination Provision" - appropriate?

Comment_arrow

lyn

1:58 pm on Sunday, January 27, 2013

So, unless you are talking about something completely different, or I am not understanding your point, I don not understand your rant - especially since a person working only in the private sector, regardless of number of years worked or amounts earned, the MOST social security they can collect in any year is about $28,000.

Lastly, I'd appreciate it if you want to comment, try to stay away from insults and stay on topic.

Comment_arrow

James Murphy

2:04 pm on Sunday, January 27, 2013

well for someone with the skill sets that you developed as a teacher who now works for a private company that is benefiting from the expertise you bring to their endeavors I would have thought you would have come up with a user name better than BUSTER CHOPS

Comment_arrow

lyn

2:12 pm on Sunday, January 27, 2013

James-
Don't give him too hard a time, this is the kind of comment he made to another previously:
"Wussification of America. ..., you probably wear pnk panties and hit people with your purse. Man Up!" Is that also an example of his self described 'exemplary' teaching character?

Comment_arrow

Buster Chops

4:52 pm on Monday, February 11, 2013

Lyn,
Please find where I said I will not get Social Security. I simply stated that I will never get everything that I have contributed. You really are quite a failure of the education system. There is also a little something called Government Pension Offset. If you are going to quote the law, why don't you actually read it and understand it before you pop your cork?

Comment_arrow

lyn

5:54 pm on Monday, February 11, 2013

Buster-
WOW- Full of personal attacks, aren't you?
But, on topic, I saw no comments disputing or arguing the opinions or facts from me or others.
I will respond to your question, though.
You said:
"Please find where I said I will not get Social Security. I simply stated that I will never get everything that I have contributed."

HERE:
"During that time I have been paying Social Security taxes that I will never collect because of my state retirement." - above, 11:23 am on Sunday, January 27, 2013

kenneth malady

5:34 pm on Sunday, January 20, 2013

With as much as you always have to say lyn - my guess is you are a stay at home mom !!!

Reply

Rolly Pekar

7:19 pm on Sunday, January 20, 2013

If teaching is such a sweet deal Lyn, why not give it a try?

Reply
Comment_arrow

lyn

7:29 pm on Sunday, January 20, 2013

Such intelligent comebacks.

Try debating the facts.

lyn

7:33 pm on Sunday, January 20, 2013

When will some of you realize that the greed of the teachers comes at the expense to the students? The more you pay out to and for the teachers, the less is left for the kids.

Reply

kenneth malady

8:59 pm on Sunday, January 20, 2013

I'll be glad to debate the facts lyn, but first I would like to know your qualifications !! Also, you question how their salaries compare to ADJOINING cities. Actually you have to look at COMPARABLE cities !!! Negotiators usually end up with a contract that is FAIR for both sides or they go to arbitration !!! Once again I ask you where you've ever worked!!! It's easy to say what someone is WORTH if you've never had a job !!!

Reply
Comment_arrow

lyn

7:47 am on Monday, January 21, 2013

Get over it - I'm not about to list my employment history. Its good enough to tell you that my taxes and those of other residents of Strongsville go to pay the overpaid salaries of teachers as well as taxpayers having paid THEIR entire share of retirement contribution and contribute to their handsome benefits. The greed needs to stop. The question is not what I or anyone else does, but better yet, as tom said, to have a teacher come on here to explain why they should get a raise.

lyn

2:23 pm on Monday, January 21, 2013

"As for the pension and health benefits that may be better than in the private sector, this is offset by the fact that the employer has to pay lower payroll taxes and no overtime pay as in the private sector."

HUH?
Salaried employees in the private sector do not normally get overtime. And, thank you, what are you trying to prove - the fact that teachers DO get paid too much? If the private sector employer pays less in payroll taxes, 6.2%, vs. Strongsville paid 24% (the teachers 10%, unlike most all districts, and the employers 14%), based on what you are saying, there should be much less going to the teachers because there is much less available after the payroll related items are funded.

So, we should all be happy that not only do we pay them the salary we do, but its okay that we paid this full 24% towards their retirement so they could have retired at age 53 (if taught for 30 years) with full benefits, collecting maybe $48,000/year, while the normal person in the private sector has to wait til their mid 60's to retire with full benefits and the very most they can collect from social security is $28,000.

If my numbers are wrong, please correct me. But otherwise - don't give me a sob story. Not interested. And, yes, there are changes being phased in over the next few years - that's why I used the past tense for simplicity.

Reply
Comment_arrow

lyn

2:27 pm on Monday, January 21, 2013

And "teacher greed" is further evidenced by expecting the taxpayers, who have to pay a significant portion of their own healthcare, to continue to fund other peoples - namely, the teachers. Its hard enough for people today to pay their own bills - how about the teachers paying their share as well?

Comment_arrow

lyn

2:45 pm on Monday, January 21, 2013

Another example of "teacher greed" and being overpaid...
$67,610 Average teacher salary 2009-2010 ($68,758 median salary) per ODE
+$6,761 The 10% TEACHERS retirement contribution in lieu of salary ($6876 median)
_______
$74,371 True average teacher salary ($75634 median)

$73,189 Median HOUSEHOLD income for Strongsville in 2009
$33,356 per capita income

So, if you compare these figures, how can ANYONE expect the citizens of Strongsville to fund these greedy publicly paid employees at any higher rates? Do they really think we should be working so they can be that much better off than the community they are working in? Do they really expect that 1 teacher should be making more than 1 household does?

(I have used these years because they were the most available for comparison)

Comment_arrow

lyn

12:54 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

OK, I'll correct myself.
Those teachers at the high end, those who have been working there for years, now just making over $80,000
(actually, $88,000 for 9 months when you add in that 10% that they don't contribute to their own retirement),
can collect $53,000, not $48,000, about 12 or 13 years before someone in the private sector can collect the maximum full social security benefit of $28,000.
Nothing like sticking it to us taxpayers and still want more.

Comment_arrow

lyn

7:14 pm on Monday, January 21, 2013

OK, I'll correct myself.
Those teachers at the high end, those who have been working there for years, now just making over $80,000
(actually, $88,000 for 9 months when you add in that 10% that they don't contribute to their own retirement),
can collect $53,000, not $48,000, about 12 or 13 years before someone in the private sector can collect the maximum full social security benefit of $28,000.
Nothing like sticking it to us taxpayers and still want more.

Comment_arrow

Buster Chops

5:01 pm on Monday, February 11, 2013

Lyn,
A long time ago possessives were added to the English language. Some of them are formed by adding 's to some singular words, ' to some plural words, and no apostrophe at all to some pronouns. The details can be quite confusing since all of these can be possessive determiners, my, mine, his, hers, theirs, ours, its, etc.

I notice that either you are ignorant of such rules, or else you own an e.e. cummings autograph model keyboard.

So pick one - teachers, teacher's, teachers' - but only one is right in any given thought.

Your lack of education erodes any logical argument you attempt to assemble.

kenneth malady

3:10 pm on Monday, January 21, 2013

I repeat - GET A JOB so you can first know what it's like to HAVE a job !!! Easy to comment when you don't have to work !!!

Reply
Comment_arrow

James Murphy

6:04 pm on Monday, January 21, 2013

kenneth what may I ask do you do for a living

Tina

6:08 pm on Monday, January 21, 2013

Jean,
My daughter(s) are in high school and middle school. They certainly don't work for you. I don't work for you either. I work for my families and my students. Why is it you think that paying taxes allows you to decide my salary? You pay taxes to contribute to the goods and services in your community. You don't pay my salary. You don't pay the salary of the teachers in Strongsville. Very little of your taxes actually make it into the pocket of a teacher. I am a teacher will tell you that I DO deserve my salary. I work holidays. I work weekends. I am on call to parents and students until 11 PM. I have hours of homework every night. I have weeks of work in the summer. I end up having @ the same amount of time off as my husband, who gets 4 weeks a year. I go to school in the summer and work for students without pay. I meet with their parents outside the school day without pay. Perhaps you are trying to judge all teachers based on a poor teacher you might have had. There are poor employees in all types of jobs. I'm not one of them. I earn every penny of my salary and then some. Strongsville teachers make far more than I do and have more prep periods. So what? I don't feel I have the right to tell anyone what they should make or what their job should be. I can tell you that your attitude is a huge problem in our country. Other countries respect their teachers and pay them accordingly. Go away. Spread your bitterness elsewhere.

Reply
Comment_arrow

lyn

7:26 pm on Monday, January 21, 2013

" You don't pay the salary of the teachers in Strongsville."

HUH? Unbelievable! Their paychecks fall from the sky? And those operating levies were all a dream? And part of real estate taxes don't go to the schools? Are you totally unaware?
Teachers are public sector employees paid by the taxpayers.

Comment_arrow

James Murphy

8:07 pm on Monday, January 21, 2013

Tina thank you for your comments on the strongsville teachers contract
Since you are not a Strongsville teacher your work week means nothing (BUT ) your comment "Strongsville teachers make far more than I do" IS THE POINT OF THIS DISCUSSION I am glad you agree
AND TINA 100% of teachers salaries come from taxpayers in one way or another, so WE the taxpayers now want to see where are tax dollars are going

Comment_arrow

tom m

10:26 pm on Monday, January 21, 2013

Very good James .....and yes Tina I also agree with you that Strongsville teachers make way more than other area teachers do .......thanks for pointing that out

lyn

1:23 pm on Tuesday, January 22, 2013

Holly-
Young lady, what you describe as your average day is not much different than other peoples. Everyone at sometime or another feel their job is more important or involves more time and effort than other peoples, but we all know that no one really knows what is involved with a persons job until they actually do it - including a teachers job. But that doesn't exclude everyone else's job either. If all you have to worry about outside of your job is finding time for potty breaks, lunch, dinner and changing diapers - well, welcome to the real, adult world of having a family. At least it is not worse - you could have aging parents who need care, a spouse with a disability or longterm health problems, or so many other things.
No one is debating the importance of teachers in childrens lives.
The debate is over what they should be compensated and that they continue to EXPECT more and more as the public gives to them and has less and less. continued...

Reply
Comment_arrow

lyn

1:24 pm on Tuesday, January 22, 2013

How can a person expect others to not only pay their own healthcare but pay in to fund additionally for a teacher so that they don't have to pay a fair share? The taxpayers are paying their own plus the teachers share, minus the little they contribute to a better plan.
How can a teacher expect those in a city whose average household (think about how many may be working in a household) income is less than that of 1 teacher - is that fair?
And lastly, to expect taxpayers to pay a teachers share of their retirement contribution so they can receive 12 years earlier almost twice what the average person could ever possilby get?

Comment_arrow

tom m

2:07 pm on Tuesday, January 22, 2013

Lyn ....look you need to get a second job to help support the growing list of tax uses for your money
you already are being asked to support the 51% who pay no taxes
you have to now help pay for a new school (money well spent)
pay the teachers salaries ( they want a raise)
pay for the teachers retirement and healthcare (they want less out of pocket)
so quit complaining and go get that second job you have many mouths to feed

Comment_arrow

lyn

2:28 pm on Tuesday, January 22, 2013

tom-
LOL!
(But, according to Kenny, I have to go get my first job. I'm so giddy and nervous about that.)
I'm glad that new middle school is going where Center is - I just hope they spend our money wisely, since they just asked for a figure without having any plans with numbers attached to it. NO business works like that. You start with the architects and plans first, then you know what monies are needed. They are doing this backwards and this opens the door for so much mismanagement of funds.
I'm afraid they will squander whats left - I'm sure they overestimated what they needed.

Comment_arrow

tom m

2:58 pm on Tuesday, January 22, 2013

why look Lyn we must have made some very solid points ..... Holly ran off and deleted all her posts (another example of cowards hiding behind the teachers union)

Comment_arrow

lyn

6:21 pm on Tuesday, January 22, 2013

HA-HA!
To clarify my original comment...
I had just gone into her Patch comment history before Ms. Holly Lamovsky deleted them, so it was easily located in my computer's history, and therefore I was able to go to her deleted comments and print them just for future reference. But, everyone has their own emails containing her comments. So, as they say, big deal, but if she has something to hide,...

lyn

1:35 pm on Tuesday, January 22, 2013

We have Holly saying:
"If we can't attract and keep good teachers in the classroom (and how else are people attracted to any job but decent money), we can spend all the money in the world on books or other materials and kids will be no better off."

So, she feels the only measure of a good teacher is how high their salary is.
I disagree. There are many excellent teachers making less money in other districts, and probably many of those are underpaid. They made the choice, for whatever reason, to work elsewhere, and not necessarily just fight for that almighty worshipped dollar. Many prefer to stay in their hometown or go where they think they can make a valuable contribution. I would think that a teacher would not put down others in their own profession so.
Take Tina, for example, who says "Strongsville teachers make far more than I do". She sounds like a dedicated teacher as well, but just because she works where teachers are paid less does NOT mean that teachers in that district are any less qualified than here. You should know this. There are so many factors that go into the students success, besides teachers - their community and family are BIG influences, just to name 2.

Reply
Comment_arrow

kenneth malady

2:13 pm on Tuesday, January 22, 2013

Just as I thought lyn - another stay at home mom who's gonna tell me how hard it is !! And by the way JAMES i'm retired after working 41 years !!! That's why I have time to get into this debate !!!

Comment_arrow

James Murphy

6:14 pm on Tuesday, January 22, 2013

KENNY how can you criticize Lyn over any occupation she wishes to identify
come on now Kenny since when is retired a job . I mean even thou you occupy that bar stool at the strongsville cafe all day you might think that is your job now >>>> what is your nickname there???

Comment_arrow

lyn

6:40 pm on Tuesday, January 22, 2013

Kenny likes to use that line to people about getting a job. For instance,
" 4:14 pm on Tuesday, July 17, 2012
Do you even have a job ??? What do you know about unions ???"

He doesn't seem to want to discuss facts. I presented lots of numbers, and not one comment from him on any of them. He just wants to throw out this nonsense. And his comments on being a "stay at home mom" is also meant to be demeaning to those women who do choose to do this - how unfortunate to the lady he might be married to. So, that's why I haven't bothered responding to him - he just wants to exchange jabs.

Mike Gollini

3:19 pm on Tuesday, January 22, 2013

Tom, perhaps she left the conversation because she was tired of dealing with you idiots who were so concerned with verifying her true identity yet couldn't figure out that you could just Google her name. Meanwhile I notice you haven't mentioned your last name - maybe you are a coward hiding behind your computer screen?

James, as for you, what the hell do you care anyway? There is no record of anyone with your name owning any property in Strongsville anyway, so I am assuming you don't pay property taxes - which makes this none of your concern.

Reply
Comment_arrow

James Murphy

6:07 pm on Tuesday, January 22, 2013

Mike property records searches only work sometimes your name comes up on a property search comes up as the city of strongsville had to buy your house from you in 2003. Holly left because her stories were falling apart

Comment_arrow

James Murphy

7:52 pm on Tuesday, January 22, 2013

Mike Gollini
Joined Strongsville Patch
3:16 pm on Tuesday, January 22, 2013

<first post>

lyn

3:36 pm on Tuesday, January 22, 2013

Mike-
The one who "outed" her was Chapman mom when she stood up for her and said don't let certain people into your Chapman kindergarten class. I even kept that info off this page until after that door was opened.

Reply

lyn

3:48 pm on Tuesday, January 22, 2013

Brian-
Your following comment got deleted when she deleted her comments.
"Haha. When I saw Lyn's post I looked at buckeye institute myself and saw that the last name didn't match. C'mon Lyn, I expected a little better detective work :) I kid of course..."

What I said was:

"If you go to Buckeye, and search the database just under the first name (if she is really using that) - there is only one teacher with her first name. And then, finding she is at Chapman, just go to the school staff directory and find she is the kindergarten teacher."

She earlier said:
"My teaching license is in the database under my maiden name - FYI."

Therefore, of course her last names will not match.

Reply
Comment_arrow

lyn

3:51 pm on Tuesday, January 22, 2013

These comments were in response to another not being able to find her on buckeye. And AFTER Chapman mom said she was the Chapman kindergarten teacher.

Rick Steves

6:26 pm on Tuesday, January 22, 2013

Someone's been drinking Haterade.

Reply
Comment_arrow

James Murphy

7:39 pm on Tuesday, January 22, 2013

not hatred its a simple message, let the teachers pay their fair share, or let the teachers strike, (its nice and cold out)
If the school board does not want to honor the taxpayers wishes, never again will they see a school levy pass

Comment_arrow

James Murphy

7:50 pm on Tuesday, January 22, 2013

Rick Steves
Joined Strongsville Patch
6:19 pm on Tuesday, January 22, 2013

<first post>

Bill

6:35 pm on Tuesday, January 22, 2013

Lyn, Jean, Tom, and James - the only point you are all proving is what sad, miserable lives the uneducated live. Have fun spending hours a day making ignorant comments on The Patch while your homes are in foreclosure because you can't do a simple budget. Must be the teachers fault you can't afford your home or find a job. Most real jobs wouldn't allow you to spend your day surfing The Patch anyway.

Reply
Comment_arrow

lyn

6:48 pm on Tuesday, January 22, 2013

Bill-
I'm completely open to any facts you have to dispute the numbers I presented above. Or if you can interpret them differently, then why not do so.
Otherwise, your statements really hold no water - just deflecting and trying to ignore what has been posted. Don't just hit and run with character jabs. Present your numbers and facts to substantiate the other position. Maybe there is something I'm missing.

Comment_arrow

lyn

6:51 pm on Tuesday, January 22, 2013

And strange you mention uneducated when WE have gone into depth on some of these things and presented logic, facts, figures, calculations and comparisons,while others just want to argue.

Comment_arrow

James Murphy

7:35 pm on Tuesday, January 22, 2013

Bill my patch app lets me post 24/7
And bill standing on the corner with a squeegee washing passing car windows is not a real job, so we will let you have all those quarters you earn

Comment_arrow

James Murphy

7:49 pm on Tuesday, January 22, 2013

Bill
Joined Strongsville Patch
6:29 pm on Tuesday, January 22, 2013

<first post>

Comment_arrow

Head of the FBI

8:05 pm on Tuesday, January 22, 2013

Your detective work is really impressive. I would offer you a job, but your salary would be paid by taxpayers, so I doubt you would accept.

Comment_arrow

lyn

9:09 pm on Tuesday, January 22, 2013

James-
Very observant!
This will probably be the start of union/teachers coming on here to post under new names - they won't want to get caught posting like someone else has and have it get traced back to an individual member or union itself. Be prepared for more!!

Comment_arrow

Kim L

11:13 pm on Tuesday, January 22, 2013

so this is how teachers behave !!! fictitious posts i am impressed that all these people who live in "other" cities sign up on the strongsville patch to defend their friends the "teachers" we must be the center of the universe here

Comment_arrow

Head of the FBI

7:26 am on Wednesday, January 23, 2013

Kim, did it ever occur to you that someone can teach in another city but LIVE in Strongsville? Perhaps that is why they are signed up for The Patch - though your theory that you must be at the center of the universe doesn't surprise me.

kenneth malady

7:32 pm on Tuesday, January 22, 2013

Sorry jimmy boy but that's from about 10 yrs ago [at least] . I am retired and live on Sandusky Bay !!! You still haven't told us what you do !!!! If I remember correctly- you are on alot of the Patch and someone refered to you as a troll. Oh yeah i also work the summers at Cedar Point to keep busy !!! As for lyn - I'm not demeaning you or anyone for being a stay at home mom- I'm just saying that unless you work it's easy to say whaat you think someone is worth !! I have many friends who went into teaching and they didn't do it for the money !!! With police fire and teachers it seems to be more of a calling than job !!!! Holly is right about one thing - walk a mile in her shoes !!!

Reply
Comment_arrow

James Murphy

7:46 pm on Tuesday, January 22, 2013

Ken you live on SANDUSKY BAY ???????????? how exactly does the strongsville teachers contract talks affect you PLEASE just answer how your taxes are being used when it comes to the strongsville school district

Bill

7:50 pm on Tuesday, January 22, 2013

Great article written by a tax expert that explains how taxpayers actually contribute nothing to public employee pensions.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/rickungar/2011/02/25/the-wisconsin-lie-exposed-taxpayers-actually-contribute-nothing-to-public-employee-pensions/

Also, most of your facts on retirement don't apply to the majority of people teaching today. STRS has changed its rules - a teacher must have 35 years of service, not 30, AND be 60 years of age to collect their full retirement. This means teachers who began teaching right out of college (at 22 years of age) will have to teach for 38 years before they meet both requirements. There are other cost saving measures as well which you can read about here.

https://www.strsoh.org/legislation/legislation.html

Times are changing, and teachers are feeling it too. There are many issues intertwined here, and although you believe you have researched the issue well, the big picture is a much more complicated one. Surely you must admit that none of us are experts on this, so let's share information and have intelligent conversation instead of ganging up on people in some sort of witch hunt.

Reply
Comment_arrow

James Murphy

8:01 pm on Tuesday, January 22, 2013

thanks bill did you notice the first line of the story
"pays for the pension and benefits for public employees in Wisconsin."

and in strongsville the district has been paying the teachers 10% pension contribution for them

Comment_arrow

lyn

8:27 pm on Tuesday, January 22, 2013

Bill-
The Forbes/Wisconsin article you reference does not apply to Strongsville as it was agreed about 20 years ago that the taxpayers would pay the teachers portion of their retirement contribution, unlike most every other district in the state. Therefore, to say "taxpayers actually contribute nothing to public employee pensions" is INCORRECT and should read "teachers paid NOTHING into their own pensions as they were fully funded with 24% of their pay annually by the taxpayer."

Comment_arrow

lyn

8:35 pm on Tuesday, January 22, 2013

Bill-
Also, at 2:23 on Monday I DID say
"If my numbers are wrong, please correct me. ... And, yes, there are changes being phased in over the next few years - that's why I used the past tense for simplicity."
But, if you want to discuss the changes that are being phased in, including among other things, that they will be getting 77% of their final average pay instead of the current 66%, we can. However, as there are gains and losses, I would say its a wash. But of course others would rather cherry pick and give a sob story about just what is taken away rather than the benefits given - such as I have mentioned - the increase in pension benefit.

When I make my comments and give these figures for comparison, including comparing to what the average household in Strongsville make, it is to pass along info to my neighbors. So much I did not realize. Therefore, I assume others also are in that position. However, if there are haters out there of my commenting, then they can just not read my posts and move on. But let others be informed.

Comment_arrow

lyn

8:47 pm on Tuesday, January 22, 2013

I should correct myself- I said phased in over the next few years. The chart actually shows phasing in through 2023/2026.

Comment_arrow

tom m

10:38 am on Wednesday, January 23, 2013

Bill thanks ii I ever want to move to Wisconsin this will help ....... here is the OHIO 5 year outlook ............... http://fyf.oecn.k12.oh.us/genForecast.asp?IRN=44842&Format=HTML note the 5 year rise in this line ....3.020 Employees' Retirement/Insurance Benefits

kenneth malady

8:56 pm on Tuesday, January 22, 2013

James- I have friends who work there !! You STILL haven't told me what you do for a living !!!! Why the crickets ??? I've been honest !! Let's hear from you !!!!

Reply
Comment_arrow

James Murphy

10:23 pm on Tuesday, January 22, 2013

ok kenny ill play along I work at Ford Brookpark ???? but what does this have to do with the teachers contracts , BUT the bigger question is why are so concerned about how your friends taxes are spent

tom m

11:34 am on Thursday, January 24, 2013

looks around ................ I see no proud strongsville teachers have yet to step forward and explain why we need to keep covering so much of their benefits ....whats wrong teachers NEA got your tongue

Reply
Comment_arrow

lyn

1:28 pm on Thursday, January 24, 2013

I think most of us believe one teacher did - and then "poof", she regretted her comments!
They know they can't justify what they are asking for from the very people who would be paying them. How could they legitimately expect others to pay for them to enjoy better than what the average HOUSEHOLD has, including benefits? So, we are to work and support our own families and then so they can have better as well? Teachers make a valuable contribution - but come on! If they need more money, get another job during those 3 months they have off. And if they are also going to school for more classes, do like the rest of us do when we need continuing education classes - do it while you work. We don't get to take a 3 month break to take the classes or to prepare for presentations or business meetings or meet after hours with clients or... should I go on with the private sectors sob stories?

Comment_arrow

tom m

1:39 pm on Thursday, January 24, 2013

I just hope the school board understands the taxpayers concerns .............and when they yet again put their hands out for the next levy (2014?) this teachers contract will be a perfect blueprint how they spend our tax dollars ............. but do not tell bill that since he wrote
" taxpayers actually contribute nothing to public employee pensions."

Comment_arrow

lyn

1:46 pm on Thursday, January 24, 2013

Bill can pass that along to Holly - they probably know each other, they sound alike. He came on when she dropped out, remember?

Comment_arrow

tom m

1:55 pm on Thursday, January 24, 2013

actually I think "HOLLY" is now the poster who goes by "Head of the FBI"

Comment_arrow

lyn

1:56 pm on Thursday, January 24, 2013

But, I don't think Holly or Bill really expects us or the district to fund any more for the teachers (ha-ha).
Interesting comment that Holly made on the Patch about some kindergarten and first-grade classrooms being crowded this year, in referring to the district she said:

"...they can not make up for the massive amounts of money that have been cut from their budgets at the state level.
I truly believe our schools want what is best for their students and the community, but like all of us, must work within strict financial constraints."

So, she can't possible expect to take, take, take and make this statement, can she? But this is the same person who said "Teacher salaries taking money away from the kids? What is more important to a kids success in school than a good teacher?"

Comment_arrow

lyn

2:15 pm on Thursday, January 24, 2013

The last part of her comment was:
" If we can't attract and keep good teachers in the classroom (and how else are people attracted to any job but decent money), we can spend all the money in the world on books or other materials and kids will be no better off."

See, she thinks any teacher who isn't paid lots of money isn't a good teacher. A good teacher must have as their number one value - a big paycheck and taxpayer subsidized benefits. Thats why someone like
Tina
above would not fit in with Strongsville - because she seems to be more dedicated to her profession but doesn't make as much. But, I would not say she is not a good teacher - however, based on Holly's criteria, Tina must not make the grade - pretty pathetic way to judge a fellow teacher.

Comment_arrow

Strongville Resident

2:22 pm on Thursday, January 24, 2013

I missed all of the earlier posts before she (Holly) deleted them was she a Strongsville teacher??

lyn

2:29 pm on Thursday, January 24, 2013

Strongsville Resident-
It appeared quite clearly that she is, based on her comments. And then when someone stood up for her and mentioned which school she taught at and which grade, she quickly said she didn't work in this district and deleted her comments. A rather strange reaction - deleting ones comments just after that. Would seem to confirm what the other poster said.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Brian

3:10 pm on Thursday, January 24, 2013

I'm confused here. You still think she was a teacher in Strongsville?

Comment_arrow

lyn

3:18 pm on Thursday, January 24, 2013

I don't know. I am answering a question and giving my reasons for thinking she is. If not, she should have said she wasn't the one the other poster thought she was so that teacher would not get any backlash. But her actions leaves us to decide for ourselves - but it really doesn't matter in our lives. Just her comments as it relates to teachers expectations of taxpayers. I hope that explains it.

Holly Lamovsky

3:09 pm on Thursday, January 24, 2013

Since I see you all have been spending the last few days making wild assumptions about my identity and reasons for deleting my previous posts, I thought I would clear some things up for you.

I deleted my previous posts because I felt bad that parents like Chapman Mom were afraid for their kids based on your assumptions and negativity about the teaching profession. That is the last thing I would want as I am, first and foremost, a dedicated teacher. I also did not want you to do anything to hurt the job of the Chapman teacher you assumed I was. I was not ashamed of anything I said nor trying to hide anything.

Instead of spending all this time speculating about my identity, it would have been easy enough to Google my name and see that I am a teacher in the Berea City School District (not the Chapman Kindergarten teacher), graduate of Strongsville High School, and currently own a home (and pay property tax) in Strongsville.

My opinion is a simple one. I DO think teachers deserve to make a decent amount of money - it is a hard job with long hours, even if you extrapolate those hours over the 10 weeks off in the summer. I DO think teachers need to make concessions in tough economic times. In Berea we have not received raises in many years and have taken unpaid days to help the district balance their budget. Our healthcare costs have gone up as well and what I pay is in line with what my husband pays in the private sector.

Reply

Holly Lamovsky

3:21 pm on Thursday, January 24, 2013

As for my prior comment "If we can't attract and keep good teachers in the classroom (and how else are people attracted to any job but decent money), we can spend all the money in the world on books or other materials and kids will be no better off."

I stand by this comment. Talented and intelligent people that have an interest in teaching may choose another profession if the salary is not decent. Does this mean that people currently in the profession are only good if they make a lot of money? No way, I never said that. I know when I was in college and deciding on a career teaching was my first choice despite the fact that I could have made more money doing something else. Many of my classmates did not feel the same though and switched majors so they could do something more lucrative. Many of them would have made great teachers but are now doing somethings else. Of the people that do begin their careers as teachers, a huge number desert the profession. This teacher attrition costs our schools a lot of money and denies students experienced teachers. Although money is only one reason people leave, it is a more controllable factor than most.

Please do not put words in my mouth or defame my character. Even in the posts I deleted I never made any personal attacks on any of you and was simply trying to have a two-sided discussion. Please do not involve me personally in this discussion as you continue to debate the issue. Thanks.

Reply
Comment_arrow

lyn

3:33 pm on Thursday, January 24, 2013

The points you made reflect the mindset of those teachers in Strongsville wanting more. And therefore your arguments for same have become the points for debate. The fact that you presented them brought you into the debate and whether or not you intended to mislead the readers into believing that you are teacher here, you did leave us with that impression - and I think you would agree with that. Unlike Tina, you let people believe this. And, like Tina, you are in a district that pays less and should have an understanding for what the taxpayers are saying. The question is not, again, whether teachers make a valuable contribution - but the question is the value of that contribution. And when the mention was made of adjoining districts - no mention of comparison came from you about Berea. But, there really was no need for specifics of what district - only, as Tina said, that it is another paying less on average.

tom m

3:52 pm on Thursday, January 24, 2013

HOLLY that is great to hear ....and that is what we expect the teachers of Strongsville to do to help balance OUR budget .exactly in line with our neighboring cities .........
" In Berea we have not received raises in many years and have taken unpaid days to help the district balance their budget. Our healthcare costs have gone up as well and what I pay is in line with what my husband pays in the private sector."

Reply
Comment_arrow

Buster Chops

4:40 pm on Monday, February 11, 2013

Seems to me that lyn is quite an easy dupe. With regard to her frequent rants, it is interesting to see how she twists language and inserts assumptions. This is something that we more educated people can see as logical fallacies.

lyn (sic) Even though a logic course won't help you to learn to use the shift key to create a capital at the start of a proper noun, it would help you to get out of the deadly death spin you have put yourself into.

Quit whining. Pay your taxes. It's an Excellent with Distinction school district. That's worth every penny those teachers earn to put up with people like you and the many unruly spawn folks like you spew forth.

Holly Lamovsky

3:56 pm on Thursday, January 24, 2013

Lyn,
I do not agree. I did not say anything that would have or should have lead you to believe I was a Strongsville teacher. That was an assumption made by several of the people on this board and others followed suit - even going so far as to infer a fake name to support their theories when my real name was being used. I didn't mention the school district I teach for for the same reason you haven't mentioned what you do for a living when people have requested that information from you - it was irrelevant to my comments.

We obviously have different mindsets and need to come to grips with the fact that that is okay and we each have our reasons. I just don't like that the topic of your posts and some of the others has seemed to become me instead of what we are really talking about.

No where in this article does it say the teachers in Strongsville are requesting more money. There are a lot of different things that are negotiated in contracts besides salary - class size, additional teacher duties, number of classes taught, collaboration time, and prep time (just to name a few). They could be disappointed with the outcome on any one of these and that is why they are going to the school board. Could it be salary? Sure, it could be. I don't know what they are asking for as negotiations are confidential, so I can't assume that - none of us can.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jean Williams

5:32 pm on Thursday, January 24, 2013

OH but I would bet that a better Strongsville teacher contract, would benefit the berea teachers at the negotiation table when their next contract talks happen

Ken McEntee

2:13 pm on Saturday, January 26, 2013

Just making sure I have this right. With a meeting of the Board of Education already in progress, 300 teachers intentionally disrupted the meeting by walking in tardy, then, en masse, disrupted the meeting again by leaving early.

Being role models for our children, and therefore setting the example of proper behavior, I assume none of these teachers would have a problem with a dozen students walking into their classroom together, 15 minutes after the bell, then leaving together 10 minutes before the class is excused.

You think my assumption is correct?

Reply

T Jefferson

9:13 am on Sunday, January 27, 2013

Guys and gals, get back on track here. Let's have some constructive discussion about the facts and figures, not these worthless character assassinations.

You keep talking about the teachers. Talk about the Teachers Union, do some homework. Try attacking the cause, not the symptoms. It was once said, and I paraphrase this, that if you want to "control" the dog, you don't go after the tail.

Here are a couple of good books for you to read in your spare time:

1). Shakedown: The Continuing Conspiracy Against the American Taxpayer by Steven Malanga.

2). Shadowbosses: Government Unions Control America and Rob Taxpayers Blind by Mallory Factor.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jean Williams

10:14 am on Sunday, January 27, 2013

Oh we are aware it is the teachers union, that pathetic 300 teacher display walking into a already started meeting "tardy" (great point Ken McEntee) had the teachers unions fingerprints all over it, I also imagine the union forbid every strongsville teacher from answering any questions anyone asked on this subject, since all they want to do is hide under assumed names and post how they are only sticking up for their "friends" AND STILL THEY HIDE

Buster Chops

10:58 am on Sunday, January 27, 2013

You know, I've looked at the video several times, and I don't really sense any "swarm".
Is it possible that Debbie Palmer has an unsung agenda here?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Kim L

11:47 am on Sunday, January 27, 2013

swarm - noun -[swawrm]
to congregate, hover, or occur in groups or multitudes; be exceedingly numerous, as in a place or area. (fits pretty well actually)

Comment_arrow

lyn

2:03 pm on Sunday, January 27, 2013

I would say 300 teachers all walking in at the same time, 10 minutes into the meeting, qualifies as a swarm.

TSW

3:47 pm on Sunday, January 27, 2013

Teachers deliberately disrupting a meeting to make a point is both stupid and unprofessional. Smacks of outdated Teamster/UAW tactics of intended "intimidation"
Bringing some of your kids with you......was moronic. What's next a city wide teacher walkout of the classrooms in April ?

Reply

TSW

4:42 pm on Sunday, January 27, 2013

FYI, over $60million spent by Strongsville taxpayers 1993-2012 school year on pension pick ups, pick up on pick ups and related payroll taxes. And, for the 19 years ending 6/30/12, teachers got W2 raises in all but 6 years - with 4 being since 2008 when the economy went over the cliff. Ask the private sector about their raises last 4 years.Incidentally, as far as I know, Step Increases (another wonderful salary enhancing tool) have continued to kick in the past 4 years for those eligible.

Question: If average salary for SEA is currently $65K (prox)....does that mean if not for pension pick up give away (by the Board of Muppets back in early-mid 1990s which was alegedly done "in lieu of raises"---- obviously not 100% accurate)--that today we might be looking at average teacher salary of $85K ? And thus, should we be thankful to the Board of Muppets which let this runaway train leave the station in the first place ?
I estimate that average teacher salary in 1993-94 was $35K to $40K which I think may be reasonably close. Not sure how much "step increases" drive this figure..But, either way, using $40K for average salary- average teacher salary increased 62.5% for 15 yr period ending 2008 6/30 fiscal where they remain today. This is over 4% pa average. If we use $35K- it equates to 5.7% average annual pay hike. Not bad, not bad all.
Meanwhile we continue to pay $3+million pa in pension pickups and 90% of health care costs. Yet, still not good enough for SEA.

Reply

Holly Lamovsky

4:59 pm on Sunday, January 27, 2013

One more thing to consider...

If the complaint is that teacher salaries for "senior" teachers are higher than that of the median household income, look at the education level of most people in Strongsville. 63% of Strongsville residents do not have a bachelors or higher degree. This is necessary to obtain a teaching job. 87% of Strongsville residents do not have a masters or higher degree. The teachers making those higher salaries most certainly do. Their level of education and expertise in their field is higher than many residents of the city, so it is not surprising nor unwarranted that their salaries be higher than others.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Strongville Resident

5:11 pm on Sunday, January 27, 2013

Holly you sound like you are standing on your throne looking down on 87% of the little people who are of lesser worth than you

Comment_arrow

lyn

5:28 pm on Sunday, January 27, 2013

Holly-
Its going to take more than that to convince me that the average teacher salary for 9 months should be more than what one entire households income is for an entire year, and, again, not even counting their highly subsidized benefits.

Comment_arrow

Holly Lamovsky

5:42 pm on Sunday, January 27, 2013

I'm not looking down on others or assuming they are of lesser worth - just referencing the relationship between educational attainment and median income. Countless studies show that as education level goes up, so does income. This is true across the board, regardless of profession.

I am speaking of economic worth only. I am not suggesting anything about character or importance. Many of the people that have been most valuable to my life are in that 63%.

Comment_arrow

lyn

7:34 pm on Sunday, January 27, 2013

Holly-
Maybe you should explain to us what degrees are REQUIRED, AFTER they are hired.
This might help us have a better understanding. There is too much general talk about further education required and advanced degrees needed.
I'm asking about what is required AFTER they are hired because we all have to come into our jobs with certain prerequisites and educational minimums - be it nurses, accountants, lawyers, physical therapists,.. Some need more than 4 year college, some more than a masters.
So, what is REQUIRED after you are hired - what degree(s). NOT what continuing education type course or classes, because so many jobs, even those not requiring a college degree, require yearly classes. But what advanced degrees are required.
Please don't include when a teacher wants to get a degree so they will be able to perform some other duties or teach other classes, or so they can "beef up" their resume so their pay will be higher. I say this because I personally know teachers who have furthered their education so their pay will be higher.
Again, just tell us what the minimum required degree(s) a teacher must obtain after they are hired.

Comment_arrow

Holly Lamovsky

7:46 pm on Sunday, January 27, 2013

Prior to 2011 a Masters degree was required in order to renew your license after the first 7 years of teaching. This has now been changed to 6 credit hours or the equivalent professional development units each time you renew.

I am aware that many jobs require professional development, but they are usually paid for by the employer. This is not the case in education which is why the salary goes up to help offset the cost to the teachers of this.

Education is an investment for anyone and it is not unreasonable to expect a return on that investment.

Comment_arrow

lyn

8:05 pm on Sunday, January 27, 2013

Holly-
What profession or company do you know that pays for continuing education? People I know that are in the 4 professions I mentioned, all have to pay themselves - as do even hairdressers. And, this was something I have had to pay for to maintain my license - never picked up by any employer. I'm surprised that someone feels they deserve a salary bump for maintaining their license, part of their own professional resume.
Frankly, I thought you were going to offer an impressive list of degrees that a teacher is required to have. I knew I was asking a question not knowing what the answer would be, yet now I'm really surprised that teachers use this "further education" as a reason for more salary and benefits. IMO, what teachers need, is nothing more than so many other peoples requirements in the private sector - and they DO pay for their own. Some may be fortunate to be reimbursed, but I have yet to meet anyone that lucky enough. I'm sure its considered in their salary, though.

Comment_arrow

lyn

8:06 pm on Sunday, January 27, 2013

Holly-
I forgot-
Thank you for answering my question so honestly.

Comment_arrow

Holly Lamovsky

9:48 pm on Sunday, January 27, 2013

I will speak from personal experience here. When I first began teaching, a few years into my career I was bumped out of my position (reduction in force) and ended up taking a job not in teaching, but for a hotel company. I began the job at an entry level position. I was approached and asked to train for a higher position. I accepted and they paid for my training. The same scenario happened a couple more times and within a year and a half I was making more money than I had made teaching. All my training had been paid for by the company. I reached the top position I could without needing a business degree and was asked to pursue this. There was a tuition reimbursement program and I could have taken advantage of it and got another degree for practically free and then been promoted to an even higher paying position upon its completion.

These scenarios DO happen. In the end, I went back to teaching as I felt I had a more positive impact on the world there and didn't want a job that required so much travel knowing that eventually I would start a family.

Moral of the story, every job has its advantages and disadvantages. We get to choose our jobs though and in choosing them we accept those advantages and disadvantages. You should not begrudge others because they chose a job that offers better pay, hours, benefits, etc than yours may. If you are unhappy with aspects of your job, you have the choice to leave it and find a better one.

Comment_arrow

Holly Lamovsky

10:44 pm on Sunday, January 27, 2013

Lyn, also since you referenced hairdressers, I am sure you know that many salons have different levels of stylists at different price points. One can become a master stylist and earn more money per appointment as a pay off for their additional training. Getting paid more for more training and experience is hardly limited to teaching.

Comment_arrow

James Murphy

10:51 pm on Sunday, January 27, 2013

Holly after reading your latest batch of posts, it is actually a shame you are NOT a Strongsville School teacher, Our school kids would have benefited from someone so well versed (I mean that as a compliment )

Comment_arrow

Holly Lamovsky

10:30 am on Monday, January 28, 2013

James - I actually WAS a Strongsville teacher my very first year out of college many years ago. I was laid off because I was the low man on the totem pole (now that is a problem with the way things are done in schools) and that is when I began my career in Berea.
I will not for a second make the claim that the taxpayers are getting their money's worth out of every teacher, but I know they are getting their money's worth with me. I feel a great sense of responsibility to my students and my community which is why I hate all the generalizations made about teachers.

Comment_arrow

Jean Williams

12:16 pm on Monday, January 28, 2013

Holly two thing you wrote really stand out

I was laid off because I was the low man on the totem pole (now that is a problem with the way things are done in schools)

I will not for a second make the claim that the taxpayers are getting their money's worth out of every teacher

those two items are exactly the problem there are strongsville teachers that still use the same teaching techniques for the last 20 years that should have retired years ago, and others who do not possess even the most basic computer skills to answer let alone even open up a E-mail. and there continue to they hide, some of the highest teachers in the district with THEIR hand out yet again going GIMMIE,
so the anger is not directed to teachers like you holly it is directed at those teachers who you even admit exist, those who bolt out of school as soon as the buses are gone,
BUT Holly in a union them- becomes- we- becomes- us- becomes- you all

Comment_arrow

Holly Lamovsky

1:00 pm on Monday, January 28, 2013

Jean, I certainly don't disagree with you that those kind of teachers need to go. I am not sure about Strongsville, but I know that in my district there is a way to get rid of those people, and I would assume Strongsville has the same. From my experience though, this does not apply to the vast majority of teachers. Most of the people I work with are hard-working, competent, and dedicated. A few are not. Unions don't necessarily protect these people, but they do set up a process that many administrators feel too cumbersome to follow (they also have full plates) if they want to get rid of someone. How the union helps a teacher like me is by giving me a formal voice as to my working conditions. That is important to me as I want to do a good job but couldn't if my classes had 50 kids in them or if I had to teach 8 different lessons a day. I would love to see seniority go - not being able to master e-mail these days in any job is unacceptable.

Comment_arrow

Kim L

3:16 pm on Monday, January 28, 2013

at my sons first week at high school they had the parents go from class to class in which the teachers went over what was expected, they gave their email addresses and web sites to help out, until we went to his english teacher
she very proudly boasted that she owned no computer and her school issued email address has never been set up, we were to call the school and leave her a message if there was any questions, he said it was the easiest class he ever had
and you (union) think we should keep rewarding this teacher by continuing to pick up her pension and health care costs, pay increases, step increases and whatever else while the average paycheck has declined and family healthcare costs have gone up nationwide

T Jefferson

9:54 pm on Sunday, January 27, 2013

Has anyone heard anything about the ongoing negotiations since they have started?

Linscott, president of the SEA, said the teachers attended the meeting "in order to demonstrate our frustration with the LACK OF PROGRESS in negotiations." Krupinski said the district has had about 4 meetings with the teachers' union since the school year started. "I think the last meeting we had was productive," and "We had a very positive meeting."

>>> So are we to believe that in all that time they have only met face to face 4 times! Keep in mind; the teacher’s last contract expired June 30, 2012, which was 7 months ago! What are these negotiators doing, twiddling their thumbs? They say that these proceedings are confidential and cannot disclose what is being discussed. I say bull. There are other districts around the area that kept the public informed about the proceedings and the negotiations via their Web sites. I would like to know what are the discussion points on both sides of the fence and what are the issues, potential stumbling blocks, etc.. Tell me what is going on in more detail – FACTS! Is the elimination of pension pickups and teachers paying more for their medical insurance on the BOE side of the table? (If it isn’t it should be.) How much of a raise is the union asking for this time? What other perks and benefits on sitting on their side of the table?

Reply

T Jefferson

9:56 pm on Sunday, January 27, 2013

As a taxpayer, paying $6,354.70 of my $11K real estate taxes to “Schools” every year, I would like to know a little more about what is going on besides “we had a positive meeting and that it was productive”. If you look at your latest Real Estate Taxes for 2012 you will see that Schools get 57.77% of this total.

As a suggestion people of BOE, how about putting the results of the negotiations on the school Web site? How about a little more visibility, disclosure and transparency?

Reply

Mateo

10:24 pm on Sunday, January 27, 2013

You folks makes me sick. I am not a teacher, only a father. My child, his education and his future is priceless. I have no problem with my sons teacher making $80,000 for 9 months of work as you put it. I'm pretty sure teachers need degrees and continuing education. That takes time and money. Lets not forget the old saying, "our children are our future." Let's invest in them through their teachers. Finally, if you're jealous, get off the CPU, get your education degree and find a teaching job. Quit hating.

Reply
Comment_arrow

James Murphy

10:45 pm on Sunday, January 27, 2013

Mateo
Joined Strongsville Patch
10:16 pm on Tuesday, January 27, 2013

<first post>

Jean Harrison

2:34 pm on Wednesday, February 6, 2013

Teachers are way underpaid. They put many years into their own education, work very hard, and care about the students. They deserve not $80,000, but easily duoble or triple that. We should pass more school levies to bring teachers' pay to $250,000 to be closer to what family doctors are making. Think about it: It's your kids' education, don't you want the best to teach your kids!!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Kim L

3:05 pm on Wednesday, February 6, 2013

250,000 is what you want to pay teachers, what a grand statement to make on your very first comment on the Strongsville patch

Buster Chops

4:45 pm on Monday, February 11, 2013

Lyn,

Time to leave before someone drops a house on you like they did to your sister.

Reply

lyn

6:04 pm on Monday, February 11, 2013

Buster -

WOW - Full of personal attacks, aren't you?
But, on topic, I saw no comments disputing or arguing the opinions or facts from me or others.
I will respond to your question, though.
You said:
"Please find where I said I will not get Social Security. I simply stated that I will never get everything that I have contributed. You really are quite a failure of the education system."

HERE:
"During that time I have been paying Social Security taxes that I will never collect because of my state retirement." - above, 11:23 am on Sunday, January 27, 2013

Reply

T Jefferson

10:33 am on Sunday, February 17, 2013

People – can I make a suggestion here?

Time and time again we hear someone say that all of the postings (reply trails to a specific posting) from so-and-so have been deleted when she/he pulled their original post. Unfortunately, there was a lot of good discussion associated with that “train of thought” but, because the person pulled it, all of the trails that were attached to that posting are deleted as well. The other problem is that these posting trails are becoming so long, in order to keep up with what is current; one has to review/scan the entire listing to see what is new off of the original posts.

My proposal – everybody post every post in the reply box at the end of the article so that none of the postings will be deleted, and, it will be easier to follow. All you have to do is look up where you left off from before. If somebody wants to delete their post, let them. It will not disrupt or delete the train of discussions that will be in chronological order.

I can see where someone could set up a posting hoping that everyone replies to it, just so that they can delete their posting and effectively remove the content of the other postings. (Good tactic to remove the anti-union or pro-union posting information).

Reply

Leave a comment