I don't think they are capable of that kind of logic. There are a lot of people walking around consumed by wrong thinking and delusion.

So tired of this lame, uninformed comment...

whats wrong john they wont let you put your tent up or are you upset that 33% of your occupy group is in jail

ergo ... priests who sexually exploit children are the face of the Roman Catholic Church.

ok douglas would you prefer these examples for the face of the occupy movement .....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kfiVxm5g7eE
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p-WS42BBBLs
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZOZe5hmiRJg&feature=related

Come on now, you don't remember the boasts of Occupy that they want May day protests to really cause a stink, be destructive, get lots of attention???? Then you have this failed attention grabbing stunt and you back peddle so fast you almost reversed the spin of the earth. You boasted, your fringe delivered, now live with the shame.

Asking for a "link" is missing the point. Douglas's point was that every group has their extreme members. And they do. Which include the teabaggots. It's not being inferred that all "extreme" kooks go on property damage sprees.

The videos you link are black bloc groups which are not associated with OWS. While the media has gone out of their way to say they are a part of Black Bloc, they are not. You should also take a look at the Boston Tea Party. They used violent property destruction as a form of protest. These people risked going to jail to make a point.

If we want to play dishonest games as you do, we could point to a Tea Party member in Arizona who just went on a shooting spree and killed 4 people. If you were even remotely intellectually honest, you would apply the same standard to yourself and say that the Tea Party is a violent group of people. Also, you should learn basic grammar because it makes you look like you're in grade school.

tom m, you make a few mistakes here.
#1. I am not an Occupy anything person. Never said I was.
#2. You clearly have no concept of punctuation, but I guess that is not really important, just doesn't help your argument.
#3. one example? Christian - let me think real hard here...Crusades? I know, long time ago but still a valid point since we are talking extremists.
I agree that the tea party has not caused property damage directly. I agree that some in the occupy movement have. I just do not believe that an entire group, that believe that they are working towards making a country better, should be classified with the extremists of their group.

Haha. I was about to say the same thing.

Hugh if the only thing you can do is proof read means you really have not done any thing except may be went to school. Have not really been around the world and seen what the O.W.S. stands for. Nothing, I speak five languages and write not too well in any of them. However there seems to be a lot more people who can understand miss spelled words in any language than some dolt who can only speak one. But then this is one of the Leftists standard attacks. Go with facts not brain dead ideas.

Myron:
When it comes to 'brain dead', you seem to own that aspect. You write like a moron. Shut it.

he was a national socialist that does not fit tea-partiers

I smell a hypocrite.

not really hugh ......Gilbert Ready, a prospective Democratic candidate for Pinal County Sheriff

Tom: You fail to understand even a simple point because you've blinded yourself ideologically. The point is, there are a number of groups both within Occupy and the Tea Party. Most people are peaceful within both groups. However, there are a couple of nuts within both organizations. Instead of pointing out a few cases, you need to show us where decisions within the general assembly (where all decisions about Occupy are made) show violent activities. These decisions are made public for all to see. So far, there has been no decisions made within these groups either to commit property destruction or violence. Also, there are 30,000 Occupy members on Reddit. I've been visiting that forum for some time and everyone there is against violence and property destruction.

You also claim that Occupy did nothing to stop these people from attempting to blow up the bridge. This is false. It was members within the Occupy movement that called the police when they tried to incite violence. This probably tipped off the FBI and their eventual arrest. Can you tell me what the Tea Party did to prevent Jason Todd Ready from going on a shooting spree?

I think you are both wrong a NEO-Nazi does not fall into the occupy crowd or the teaparty crowd no more than the black panthers would

my facts are not wrong here is jason todd ready (JT Ready) at the occupy Pheonix Rally http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vplwUROCAFY&feature=fvwrel

Joe: You are missing the point. Radical people such as Ready and others join the Occupy and Tea Party movement to try and convert members. They could care less about the over theme.

Tom: So Ready went to both the Tea Party and Occupy. This goes perfectly with my point. Just because you have a radical person, that does not mean that they constitue the whole. I'm still waiting for you to show me the general assemblies voting to use violence.

Again, you need to start using basic grammar. It's almost impossible to tell what you are saying. You could start by capitalizing the first letter of the sentence.

Murphy: Wrong. He was much closer to the Tea Party movement who supported his anti-immigration policy. In fact, one of the themes in Occupy Phoenix is the treatment of illegal aliens and they are highly agaisnt both neo-nazis and the minutemen.

blackflame do you have anything to prove he was tea party also ( A Bill Mahar Clip does not count) on a side note the whole black bloc thing is pretty wild !!! what does the white masks mean is it a french revolution thing ( not trying to be insulting just wondering)

Black flame. You said it best he was blocked from running as a Republican and then ran as a democrat. I DO NOT KNOW IF STATEMENT IS TRUE OR NOT. But if it is the word blocked should mean something to you. Unless brain dead.

oh look 3 more occupy members arrested in chicago (yes they are occupy) http://observer.com/2012/05/19/chicago-police-arrest-3-anti-n-a-t-o-occupy-protesters-allege-plans-to-attack-obamas-chicago-h-q/

I think "members" is incorrect.

There's no dues, or applications. There's no "there" there.

They are "supporters", but not "leaders".

What's your point?

Here you are again name-calling. typical rightwinger. You can't go a post without calling someone names like you're a 10 year-old. Grow the eff up & try to get through a post w/out name calling. Then you wouldn't come across as such a loser.

Myron I have to agree With Hugh all that was missing from your post was you sticking your tounge out at him

Tom your the loser and trying to drag the rest down with you. eSaD

MENT TROY. MISS KEYED.

how can that be true some on here said that they were not even members of occupy (it must be a forgery)

YEP AND SEND THEM TO GITMO OR PAKASTAN BLACK HOTEL.

and this is your defense as you stick up for your fellow occupy members sitting in jails across the country

Those are not my words, nor anything I implied.