patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Neighbor Goes to Court Over Christmas Display

Crown Point Parkway man alleges damage after annual lighting celebration

 

 

The man behind the Christmas lights on Crown Point Parkway -- the cul de sac that's made national news for its annual holiday display -- is being sued by a neighbor in Small Claims Court.

Kevin Roberts is seeking $3,000 from Dan Hoag, alleging a fireworks display on Thanksgiving ruined his dinner and damaged his property.

The case is scheduled for a hearing Jan. 30 in Berea Municipal Court.

"I think it's a shame," said Hoag, who started the street-long decorating two decades ago with neighbor Dan Paliwoda. "We're just trying to do something nice for families and kids."

Roberts did not return a phone call seeking comment.

His complaint, filed Dec. 13, alleges debris from the fireworks damaged the roof of his house, his car and his lawn, and ruined his Thanksgiving dinner.

The suit also says that when his sister tried to leave his house on Thanksgiving 2011, she was unable to get through the crowd. 

For the last 20 years, families on Crown Point Parkway have launched the holiday season at 6 p.m. on Thanksgiving with a lighting ceremony.

The lighting event typically includes fireworks. The display fizzled in 2011 because someone called the police, who shut it down before it started.

It's against the law for residents to set off fireworks.

This year, Hoag got permission from Mayor Tom Perciak to rekindle the display. He said the city also sent two police officers to help ensure the safety of the 800 to 1,000 people gathered to watch.

The holiday display includes hundreds of thousands of lights on houses, in yards and on archways that line the sidewalks. In 1994, 11 families were invited to appear on NBC's Today Show when the street was featured.

Santa visits on the weekends, and donations left by visitors -- typically several thousand dollars -- are given to a local charity or family in need.

This year, the money went to the family of an 11-year-old Parma boy battling brain cancer.

Hoag said the Robertses participated in the display until 1999, but said Roberts' late father, who also lived at the house, then began complaining about it, saying the music was too loud, the street was too crowded and the line for Santa was too long.

Hoag said he will fight the complaint in court.

"First of all, I don't believe the cardboard tubes from the fireworks damaged anything," he said. "And this is a tradition for a lot of people. I don't think there's anything wrong with what we're doing."

• Have you joined Strongsville Patch yet? You can get headlines delivered to your inbox every morning. Click here to join

Related Topics: christmas lights strongsville, crown point parkway, and lawsuit christmas display

Tom Brennan

7:52 am on Thursday, January 17, 2013

"The lighting event typically includes fireworks. The display fizzled in 2011 because someone called the police, who shut it down before it started.

It's against the law for residents to set off fireworks.

This year, Hoag got permission from Mayor Tom Perciak to rekindle the display. He said the city also sent two police officers to help ensure the safety of the 800 to 1,000 people gathered to watch."

Fireworks are illegal, but the mayor gave permission for Hoag to ignore the law, and orders police officers to supervise the illegal act. Will love to see how that plays out in court.

Reply
Comment_arrow

lyn

8:09 am on Thursday, January 17, 2013

Setting fireworks off in a neighborhood is not the proper location. I don't even like it when people do that for July 4th, but that seems to be allowed. When someone gets badly injured or a house fire results, then maybe they will do something.

Comment_arrow

Carmen

10:26 pm on Thursday, January 17, 2013

People Lets get real Mr Roberts has participated in these events in the past so somthing else is going on that has nothing to do with his complaint other then he is lashing out. Pray for peacful resolution and everbody can get back to their lives.

Steve

7:52 am on Thursday, January 17, 2013

I thought fireworks were illegal? How many years is someone allowed to break the law. We need to start enforcing the laws we have before someone gets hurt. If we enforced the laws we have there would be less need for reactive legislation.

Reply

lyn

8:06 am on Thursday, January 17, 2013

Can you say

GRINCH ????

But, if the fireworks did do damage, the neighbors putting on the fireworks should pay for that.
However, since Kevin became the property owner (per county records) in 2008, and it appears that property was acquired for $0 from someone else with the same last name, I assume his father, this Kevin dude knows what these folks over there do at Christmas - it was no surprise when he acquired the property, so get over it or move. Not like they started doing it after you became the owner!

GRINCH! GRINCH!!

Just don't move next to me. I don't need a nasty, complaining neighbor.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Beverly

10:22 am on Thursday, January 17, 2013

I agree with you Lynn-he's lived there how many years,knew about it & even participated for a number of years. Anyone who lives in that neighborhood knows what goes on at Christmas-if you don't like it,suck it up or move. I find it hard to believe the high damages he is claiming.Sounds like there is more going on here & he's not happy in the neighborhood in general. Hopefully,for the sake of himself & his neighbors,he'll move, because no one will be happy or neighborly toward him after this :(

Faith

8:31 am on Thursday, January 17, 2013

Mr. Roberts was always very happy with the display. He participated in the lights AND helped with the fireworks. He was especially happy when the money from the donations went to the Holy Family Cancer Center in memory of his mother. This is just a case of sour grapes from a person with alot of personal problems.
As far as the fireworks, they are done in a professional and safe manner that has been checked and approved. As we have always said, if you have a problem with the lights or the fireworks you don't need to come. BUT please don't deny this event to the thousands of people who enjoy it every year. It is only 6 weeks out of the year and it has done hundreds of people (both young and old) so much good. Every year more people benefit from the donations. Every penny is given away to someone or some charity who needs it. Isn't that what the season is all about anyway?

Reply
Comment_arrow

lyn

9:12 am on Thursday, January 17, 2013

"professional and safe manner that has been checked and approved"
Who are the professionals that set them off and Who are the professionals that have checked and approved this? The fire department certify and OK this? Curious, because I would not like a fireworks display done so close to my home - doesn't seem safe for property or person.
But, as far as the Christmas display goes - get over it, GRINCH Kevin- you knew before you became the owner. If your sis needed help leaving, get out there and stop traffic for 30 seconds so she could leave. Or better yet, since your family hates it so much and knows it is coming every Thanksgiving - have your dinner earlier, another day or at your sisters house!

cassandra

8:36 am on Thursday, January 17, 2013

If there was damage he should have complained THAT day and not on 12/13 about his sister not being able to get through the crowd. This guy his being a jerk, doesn't like that his house isn't getting the attention!

Reply

Bob

8:46 am on Thursday, January 17, 2013

The laws apply to everyone in America except me. LOL.

Reply

Patricia Gross Solich

9:21 am on Thursday, January 17, 2013

Seems like a scrooge who won't be happy until they are not allowed to do the lights/fireworks anymore. Why should one person be allowed to decide? I think it is wonderful. They raise money for charities and the Kids Love it! He knew when he moved in the street had this tradition. Too many things are being changed because of someone's feeling or beliefs. IF damage was done, show them a repair bill. I don't think there was any damage. He knew about the fireworks ahead of time I am sure, so how did it ruin his dinner? Since the mayor approved them and had police on the street it was legal. Keep up the good work. I sure hope he doesn't ruin it for everyone else!

Reply

Robin Rosario

9:27 am on Thursday, January 17, 2013

I am a parent that brought my children to the Crown Point display for as many years as I can remember. I even have a friend who benefitted from the Crown Point donations gathered in the year before she passed. I am now bringing my grandson to see the lights along with many family members and out of town relatives and friends. It has truly become a family tradition for us. It is heartwarming to think that with all the problems in today's world that these families still take from their time and pockets to ensure that others enjoy the holiday season in a safe and tasteful family environment. If a homeowner's property was damaged then that is too bad and I am sure that Mr. Hoag will see that the wrong is righted. I say, please continue on in the spirit of giving and tradition.

Reply

lyn

9:30 am on Thursday, January 17, 2013

"For the last 20 years, families on Crown Point Parkway have launched the holiday season at 6 p.m. on Thanksgiving with a lighting ceremony."
No new news here! Eat earlier or at sisters house.
But don't deprive everyone else of the Christmas spirit.

Reply

Tom Brennan

9:40 am on Thursday, January 17, 2013

Faith stated: "As far as the fireworks, they are done in a professional and safe manner that has been checked and approved". If this is true, I'm sure she would be willing to name the state licensed pyrotechnics operator who put on the exhibit, as well as the name of the fire department representative who signed off on an approval. I know that the state fire marshal's office has very stringent guidelines on fireworks exhibits, and I doubt that a residential heighborhood congested with homes and people would be granted consent under those guidelines.

Reply

MR804

9:48 am on Thursday, January 17, 2013

How did this possibly ruin his "Thanksgiving dinner". Did it affect the way his turkey tasted? What a miserable person. I recommend he moves to the country with 20 acres to avoid any interaction with humans.

Reply

tom m

9:56 am on Thursday, January 17, 2013

His complaint, filed Dec. 13, alleges debris from the fireworks damaged the roof of his house, his car and his lawn, and ruined his Thanksgiving dinner ....... ummmmm 3000.00
damage to a lawn in November ??? its still winter how can you tell
ruined his dinner??? the entire city knew of the event for the last 20 years at 6PM and yet, HE chose to have dinner at his house and at 6 pm
Damaged the roof on his house ???? if the damage happened at 6PM how did you see it happen???
Which leaves Damage to his Car ???? 3000.00 that must be some car

Reply

tom m

10:31 am on Thursday, January 17, 2013

"Hoag said he will fight the complaint in court."

If anyone would like to help our fellow neighbor Mr Hoag defend this in court
please send your letter to

Thank You Dan Hoag
14395 Crown Point Parkway
Strongsville, OH 44136

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mary Ruth

10:35 am on Thursday, January 17, 2013

Thank you. Mr. Hoag is not my neighbor but we have enjoyed his spirit of Christmas so we will send him a letter and a donation for his cause.

Comment_arrow

Jean Williams

10:51 am on Thursday, January 17, 2013

Thats a great idea, its the least we can do for all the joy they have brought to all of us

Comment_arrow

JOE S

11:05 am on Friday, January 18, 2013

I grew up in this neighborhood... The Hoag family is a great family. Families from all over come to visit this event and its a positive event for not only the development but also the community. With all the negative things going on in this country... Mr Roberts is going to complain about this......sorry about my language BUT F*** OFF GRINCH.

Comment_arrow

Chooch

12:26 pm on Friday, January 18, 2013

Thank you Dan for not living next to me!

Comment_arrow

Jean Williams

12:45 pm on Friday, January 18, 2013

And II am pretty sure he does not want to have a neighbor who goes by " CHOOCH "

Mary Ruth

10:33 am on Thursday, January 17, 2013

I am sad for the person who is doing the complaining. Silly things like my sister couldn't get out of the driveway (was she ill, was there an emergency, why didn't you have someone stop traffic - I am sure Mr. Hoag would have helped if asked) or the fireworks ruined his roof?! I am sad for this person who is doing the complaining because his life must be sad. He must have many unresolved issues. Sad that one person feels compelled for his own reasons to ruin a beautiful feeling for hundreds and hundreds of other people. What can we do to help you, sir?

Reply
Comment_arrow

lyn

10:37 am on Thursday, January 17, 2013

This might help -
Give him the name of a realtor to sell his house - by next Thanksgiving.

lyn

10:48 am on Thursday, January 17, 2013

From Berea Muni Court website:
The Small Claims Court is a division of the Berea Municipal Court which allows parties to file MONEY ONLY claims up to $3,000.00 or counterclaims up to $3,000.00.

So, he is suing for the max. Wonder what actual damage happened to his roof - or is this a way to get his roof repaired that was needed before the fireworks? Like making someone else pay your bill - that someone being a person you have a problem with, so stick it to them. Sounds like this is more a problem of neighbors not getting along, a long time feud?, seeing as it looks like his dad owned the property for 30 years before Kevin acquired it in 2008.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Kim L

11:13 am on Thursday, January 17, 2013

I think someone should look at the property records of this house closer

Resale 12/03/2008 Buyer: Kevin Roberts
Seller: Ralph F Roberts

Resale 08/22/2006 Buyer: Ralph F Roberts
Seller: Ralph F Roberts

Resale 04/22/2003 Buyer: Cheryl Roberts (Beneficiary), Deborah Roberts (Beneficiary) (Beneficiary), Donna Medlin (Beneficiary), Gerald Roberts (Beneficiary), Kenneth Roberts (Beneficiary), Kevin D Roberts (Beneficiary), Mary Ellen Fern (Beneficiary), Nancy Gussy, Ralph F Roberts
Seller: Ralph F Roberts

how do you sell your house to your kids, then 3 years later sell your house that you no longer own to yourself again, then sell your house to your kid 2 years later ???

Comment_arrow

tom m

11:46 am on Thursday, January 17, 2013

Strongsville patch readers are so well informed............... by tonite we will all know what he buys from the grocery store and what movies he rents

Comment_arrow

lyn

12:05 pm on Thursday, January 17, 2013

tom-
That's what you get when you go public with your nuisance gripes.
And, yes, filing in small claims court is going public.

Ralph

10:56 am on Thursday, January 17, 2013

Before moving to Strongsville 19 years ago, the realitor showed us Hoags neighboring house. When we exited, two women approached and told us that the block has a large Christmas Display. Although we bought elsewhere in Strongsville we appreciated the heads-up and frankly couldn't imagine how beautiful the street looks. Point being that this is not a new celebration and the residents forewarn anyone before they move in. Please keep the tradition going and don't let one family discourage you Crown Point residents.

Reply

Faith

10:56 am on Thursday, January 17, 2013

Just to clarify things, Mr. Roberts was actually living on the street with his parents when the rest of us moved in. He is one of the first homes built on the street. That being said, he was more than willing to decorate and come to neighborhood parties and have input on who the donations went to for many, many years.
Another side note to Mr. Brennan. We have approval from the Strongsville City Police Department and the Strongsville City Safety Director. Unfortunately, I have not seen it in writing at this point or I would happily share it with you. Do we have a state approved professional setting off the fireworks? The answer would be no. Do we have experienced people setting off the fireworks? Yes with many years of backround. As I mentioned earlier, Mr. Roberts happily participated in setting these off for many years. That much we do have proof of - many pictures in many family photo albums.
Instead of focusing on what you feel is negative, Mr. Brennan. Would you like to come over and view the pictures of all the Make a Wish children who have benefitted and the letters thanking us for donation? You are more than welcome to do that at any time.
I also would like to address the mention of Mr. Roberts sister being at his home when the fireworks were going off and not being able to leave. If she was there she must have walked. I WAS there and her car was nowhere to be seen. Interesting.

Reply
Comment_arrow

lyn

11:21 am on Thursday, January 17, 2013

Kevin is now a grown man, I believe in his 50's.
If he was soooo unhappy living on that street with his father, then Kevin should have sold the home upon his dad's passing when Kevin acquired it and started a new, happier life instead of what appears to be basking in the ongoing feud.

Ralph

11:08 am on Thursday, January 17, 2013

Just some friendly advice from a litigation perspective; Don't write anymore Faith. No need to incriminate in this media.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Faith

11:24 am on Thursday, January 17, 2013

Thanks Ralph I will do my best. Even though there is NOTHING I have written that is not fact and cannot be back up. I do appreciate it though.

Comment_arrow

lyn

2:31 pm on Thursday, January 17, 2013

What?
No pictures of his roof?

Comment_arrow

lyn

2:51 pm on Thursday, January 17, 2013

I don't need a picture of his ruined Thanksgiving dinner, though. He probably had a dog that reacted to the noise and it created chaos like Snots did in "Christmas Vacation" - I'm running that scene through my mind right now.

Comment_arrow

lyn

2:58 pm on Thursday, January 17, 2013

But just in case someone out there wants to see Snots in action...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jdyo4evwMxU

Comment_arrow

lyn

3:14 pm on Thursday, January 17, 2013

With all this evidence, he should win!
But how will he prove the crowd problems?
Maybe this will help
http://www.agentofchaos.com/spencer04_jpg.html

Karen

1:14 pm on Thursday, January 17, 2013

My family and I have attended the celebration for a number of years and were in attendance in 2012 -- 11 of us in total. First of all, none of us recall seeing a car parked in Mr. Roberts' driveway at the time that the fireworks were being set off. It would have been hard not to see it as we walked on the sidewalk that lies between Mr. Roberts' house and the Hoag residence before and after the lighting ceremony. Judging by the look of excitement on the faces of the children and adults alike, I would hate to see any part of the enjoyment come to an end because of one disgruntled neighbor. If the fireworks were permitted by the major and with the blessing of the safety director, then who are we to criticize? Congratulations to the Crown Point cul-de-sac (minus Mr. Roberts) for the painstaking hours spent setting up the display, for willingly increasing their own electric bills to bring joy to others, and for collecting donations to give to very worthy causes. Thank you for all that you do to bring positive attention to the neighborhood and to the City of Strongsville. Mr. Roberts, I hope that your heart grows three sizes some day soon.

Reply

Debbie

3:25 pm on Thursday, January 17, 2013

What a bunch of who-ee. Folks, this man owns a house and property. Perhaps he did participate years ago, however, as time passes so do circumstances. If this spectacle has lasted approx. 20 years, than people living there are 20 years older. Priorities change as well as health and wealth. A person 55 at that time is now 75.

Why should this person have to have his Thanksgiving disturbed yearly? Doesn't he have a right to be thankful? Share dinner and times with family/friends? What about his rights?

It seems that there is a group of people so rapt with the over-the-top celebration and bragging rights, they have forgotten to be respectful of others. If outsiders will be disappointed if the annual event is tamed, then let them create their own colossal on their street. Then, the people like Mr. Hoag can have a respite by handing the baton to others.

This would be a wonderful beginning of a new event. People could be made aware of the change of locale in advance. Finally, people on that street and surrounding areas will get to enjoy Thanksgiving and Christmas in their own ways.

Reply
Comment_arrow

lyn

3:33 pm on Thursday, January 17, 2013

The answer is in your comment. If someone changes, why should everyone else have to?
Besides, he wasn't the owner 20 years ago. From county records, it looks like he lives in his deceased fathers home, which he could have sold when he inherited it - if he didn't like the annual event.

Comment_arrow

Karen

4:24 pm on Thursday, January 17, 2013

Debbie - There are 11 houses in total on the cul-de-sac alone. Of the 11, 10 households participate and clearly enjoy the service they provide to the development, the community and public in general. And you're suggesting that 11 households should stop because of ONE individual person? Yes he has rights...but the approximately 800-1,000 people in attendance (as referenced in the above article) also have rights. Keep in mind also that this Christmas lighting display raises funds for worthy causes such as the 11-year-old boy from Parma who is battling brain cancer. He was the recipient of the donations given during the month-long lighting display. Have you stopped to consider what difference that may have made for him/his family? Or to the various families who received the donations in previous years? To the residents who live on Crown Point and provide such a beautiful display: Please continue to light up the street as well as the sky!

Comment_arrow

tom m

4:37 pm on Thursday, January 17, 2013

He was especially happy when the money from the donations went to the Holy Family Cancer Center in memory of his mother....................................Kevin Roberts should return that money so that it can be used to honor the memory of someone who raised their children to be less bitter and thoughtless ...............

Comment_arrow

Faith

7:55 am on Friday, January 18, 2013

Debbie, I would like to address the 3rd paragraph of your note. Over the top celebration? Maybe so, but I would like you to tell that to the countless number of senior citizens who are brought in by bus and the children who ask their parents if they can go see the 'Santa Street'. Bragging right? Doubtful, very doubtful. Majority of people don't even know the about of things going on on our street. Why do people not know? Because we do these things because we enjoy it and want to do some good where we can. We believe that you do things for that reason NOT so you can tell people "I did this". Let me get this straight, you think that our display should be moved to another street because one loner with issues wants it done? Until you know the ENTIRE story you should probably leave the comments to people who actually know the facts. You are welcome to come find out the facts if you are even interested in them.

Mary Ruth

4:40 pm on Thursday, January 17, 2013

Debbie while you are right in saying that times changes things - it doesn't change things for all people - that's how traditions are born and continue to enhance all of our lives.
The question here is what is really bothering bothering Mr. Roberts. Has he had an issue with a neighbor? Is he not feeling well himself? Why would anyone cause such a stir over what the majority of people love and cherish?
I do feel for Mr. Roberts. But typically in this country majority rules and since 10 our of the 11 neighbors have no problem with the display/fireworks, etc. as a matter of fact they also look forward and participate in it, then perhaps the majority rules should be in effect in this matter. And if Mr. Roberts has grown so old that he can't enjoy Christmas anymore, perhaps it is time for him to look for a senior citizens neighborhood...preferably one that does not allow children or sining or pets or good spirits to reside. So sad, Mr. Roberts!
There must be a way to amicably settle this dispute. Christmas is not something to argue about - it's a time to enjoy being alive - it's a time to enjoy all the wonders of Christmas. This type of issue truly brings the Grinch to everyone's mind.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Steve

10:38 pm on Thursday, January 17, 2013

If the majority of the people would like to have ameteurs blow off 10 minutes of dangerous illegal fireworks next to your house would that be ok.

Comment_arrow

James Murphy

11:11 pm on Thursday, January 17, 2013

as opposed to drunk amateurs blowing off 30 minutes worth of illegal fireworks next to your house on the 4th of july

John Wells

5:28 pm on Thursday, January 17, 2013

i've heard that not all the rest of the neighbors are that crazy about this, but tolerate the whole thing just to avoid the hassles. Dan & Faith Show all the way.

Reply
Comment_arrow

tom m

6:37 pm on Thursday, January 17, 2013

and I heard that some of your neighbors wont go near your house because someones friends brother knows someone who said you kick dogs

Comment_arrow

Marian

12:09 am on Friday, January 18, 2013

My husband, I & our 4 yr. old son moved here from VA in July '92. In August we were asked by Dan & Dan if we had any Christmas lights. We only had a few. Then they asked if we minded traffic, "Are you kidding me? This is a cul-de-sac; how could traffic here compare to what we had in DC?" Long story short, we agreed to participate. We were the, "tie down house". if we participated, everyone else would. Everyone did.

Living on this holiday inspired cul-de-sac has been wonderful! We have so many precious memories, of children (including our own, doing Santa & Friends on weekends in December), of people helped, of the hot chocolate/coffee & cookies nights for the Make-A-Wish familes, of 1000's of smiles, fun times with neighbors, etc. I don't know anyplace else I could find this kind of neighborhood camaraderie!

Kevin Roberts and his father were active participants for years. His father used to invite the children into his house to view his train set, that was set up all year round. His father also used walk around the cul-de-sac wishing everyone a Happy New Year, inviting himself in to our homes to share in a drink with him.

Kevin himself was so involved @ 1 time, that he set up a car counter, so we could count the number of cars. He was also the 1st (and only) one to set up/display synchroniized pvc lights.

Time affects us all; my once 4 yr. old is soon to be 25. Now we just display a "Ditto" sign, but our holiday spirit remains the same.

Comment_arrow

Faith

8:04 am on Friday, January 18, 2013

John, I feel the need to address your comment directly. I am fairly certain that I know what and where you 'heard' there are people who 'tolerate' the lights of the "Dan and Faith Show" (thanks for the compliment by the way). Just to clarify, WITH THE FACTS, any 'issues' that may be ongoing are NOT a result of the lights. In 20 years I have never had issues with anyone over the lights. And I don't plan on doing so. I am certain the Dan will not 'hassle' people because of them. If you know either of us you know that we will do what we want and enjoy regardless and ignore the naysayers. Very Sincerely, Co-Star of the Dan and Faith Show

Bob

6:15 pm on Thursday, January 17, 2013

Fireworks in the city are ILLEGAL. Will the Mayor allow me now to shoot off fireworks whenever I want to? He's opened a can of worms here. Don't know what fireworks and Christmas lights have in common; lights are fine, fireworks seems over the top.

Reply
Comment_arrow

tom m

6:31 pm on Thursday, January 17, 2013

blocking state routes are ILLEGAL also but the MAYOR allows SR 42 to be blocked for a parade ...This year, Hoag got permission from Mayor Tom Perciak .....so bob no can of worms were opened ........if you want to shoot off fireworks you must get permission from the mayor first

Comment_arrow

Chooch

12:47 pm on Friday, January 18, 2013

Keep the Lights, lose the Illegal Fireworks! Problem Solved!

Comment_arrow

Jean Williams

1:47 pm on Friday, January 18, 2013

A permit may be issued by a mayor, village president or town chair or any person designated by the mayor, village president or town chairperson.

Comment_arrow

tom m

4:14 pm on Friday, January 18, 2013

hahaha.......silence from the lambs

Tom Brennan

7:25 pm on Thursday, January 17, 2013

One more time, the fire department has to sign off on fireworks displays, the mayor or police chief/safety director does not have that authority. But I did forgot about the Christmas lighting event on the Commons the past two years that has included fireworks. I guess when the fire chief is beholden to the mayor, that approval is a foregone conclusion

Reply
Comment_arrow

James Murphy

7:43 pm on Thursday, January 17, 2013

so Tom Brennan you have first hand knowledge and are stating that the fire department did not sign off on the fireworks display

Tammi Carney

2:37 am on Friday, January 18, 2013

I have known the Paliwodas and Hoags for many years. They are two of the most giving gererous families I ever met in my life. Debbie "bragging rights" don't even factor into the equation here. They do this to make others happy. Dan, Dan, Faith and Gennifer thank you so much for keeping your wonderful tradition. ...may it go another twenty years. Mr Roberts I hope you figure out what's really eating you and resolve the issue. Mr Wells it's people like you who made me happy I left Strongsville. The words "I heard" are amongst the worst in the English language. Shame on you for being a gossip. Dan I'm sorry this is happening to you and your family. I'm hoping things rule in your favor

Reply

food dude

7:07 pm on Thursday, January 24, 2013

Has anyone seen the you tube video of Strongsville Thanksgiving day fireworks to see how safe the fireworks are deployed at 14395 Crown Point Parkway. It should be on the chandler Commons web page for prospective home buyers.

Reply
Comment_arrow

James Murphy

7:16 pm on Thursday, January 24, 2013

just as safe as all the fireworks "deployed" on the 4th of july by drunk homeowners all over the city

Comment_arrow

Marian

3:37 am on Friday, January 25, 2013

Post the link, pls and ty.

Comment_arrow

lyn

8:40 am on Friday, January 25, 2013

Is this it?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SoJQa6KCpRY
Looks like this is taken from the neighbors, Kevin's, upstairs window. So, there seems more interest in videoing the people setting off the fireworks for a soon to be filed lawsuit. So, since he can be so ready to get this on you tube, lets see the actual roof, car and lawn damage. All sounds a little suspect to me. If a normal person was to tape fireworks, they would point up, not at the people setting them off. Now I really doubt his claim. Probably wants other previous unrelated damage fixed.
However, I still don't think this activity should go in a neighborhood. But that won't make Kevin happy - not as long as his neighbors celebrate Christmas.

Comment_arrow

lyn

9:00 am on Friday, January 25, 2013

Why was there no damages sought for his driveway?
Those fireworks, going straight up, as he taped, would hit the pavement next to the lawn and car IF damage was done.
All evidence says - NO WAY KEVIN!
Withdraw your filing before you look any more foolish!
Especially when you add that Dinner is ruined, when you know this Christmas celebration happens every year, AND that sis can't leave - more your fault for not helping to stop traffic.
By taping your neighbors, just proves you had previous intent to file a negligent lawsuit!

Comment_arrow

Kim L

11:13 am on Friday, January 25, 2013

Lyn your thankgiving dinner would be ruined too if the dinner host spent it up in his bedroom alone with a video camera taping his neighbors

Comment_arrow

Beverly

12:19 pm on Friday, January 25, 2013

very funny Kim-don't even want to gander a guess at what else is on that video-I'm sure his personal problems go much deeper than the Christmas display . I hope he is able to resolve them in a manner that is positive for both he & his neighbors-I know a great realtor if he's interested.

food dude

8:07 pm on Thursday, January 24, 2013

Gee what is the diffefence between theses folks and the drunks ? Maybe there were alot more fireworks ?

Reply
Comment_arrow

James Murphy

9:16 pm on Thursday, January 24, 2013

lets not be childish july is a hot dry month dry brush everywhere people shoot fireworks off all the time (most are drunk) the city has yet to burn down
november is a cold wet month snow and soggy leaves everywhere these people shoot off a few fireworks (I assume sober) with the citys permission since money raised goes to a good cause except $3000.00 damage to his lawn

Kim L

11:06 am on Friday, January 25, 2013

well its pretty clear by the video that this was posted by Mr Roberts himself, But it is a great video to prove how petty this man was. he claims that his thanksgiving dinner was ruined by the fireworks display, but he spent his dinner in his back window taping the event.
Also this video will kill his own claim in court because it shows 2 thing about the fireworks, the first being the wind direction, which was blowing away from his property as would the car,roof,lawn damaging hot ashes and second how small and minor these fireworks were, these were smaller than what we let our kids shoot of on the beach at hilton head
Thank you Mr Roberts For Posting your evidence on youtube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SoJQa6KCpRY

Reply
Comment_arrow

Beverly

3:14 pm on Friday, January 25, 2013

This will definitely only hurt his claim.It's as if he intentionally set up the whole matter so he could sue & cause trouble for his neighbors. Problem is this video works against his claim given the small,controlled display & obvious visual that the fireworks were blowing AWAY from his house.I did not see one indicator on that video that the fireworks entered onto his property or home. Save your time & court fees Kevin-the world is full of frivolous lawsuits & the magistrate will sniff this one out straight away.

Jean Williams

12:31 pm on Friday, January 25, 2013

friv·o·lous
[friv-uh-luhs]
adjective
characterized by lack of seriousness or sense: frivolous conduct.

self-indulgently carefree; unconcerned about or lacking any serious purpose.

(of a person) given to trifling or undue levity: a frivolous, empty-headed person.

of little or no weight, worth, or importance; not worthy of serious notice: a frivolous suggestion.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Steve

8:17 pm on Tuesday, January 29, 2013

na•ive
adjective
1. Having or showing unaffected simplicity of nature or absence of artificiality; unsophisticated; ingenuous.
2. Having or showing a lack of experience, judgment, or information; credulous: She's so naive she believes everything she reads.

Terry B.

6:45 pm on Friday, January 25, 2013

Shooting off fireworks is still illegal without a permit from the fire department, in addition to being done by a licensed exhibitor. The fire marshal has the final say, not the mayor. Please feel free to call the Strongville Fire Department's fire prevention bureau for clarification, the number is on the city website. Despite what some posters on this site may believe, this video will probably help Mr. Roberts' case.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jean Williams

12:55 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

terry b or food dude or steve, chooch or whoever you want to post as next
here is the state law on firework and who can issue them

A permit may be issued by a mayor, village president or town chair or any person designated by the mayor, village president or town chairperson.
now all these other people you are trying to claim are positions hired by the mayors office and report to him (and can be replaced by him)
so keep trying your case who I assume is Mr Roberts himself behind all these first time posters

Jean Williams

7:33 pm on Friday, January 25, 2013

terry b or food dude or steve, chooch or whoever you want to post as next
here is the state law on firework and who can issue them

A permit may be issued by a mayor, village president or town chair or any person designated by the mayor, village president or town chairperson.
now all these other people you are trying to claim are positions hired by the mayors office and report to him (and can be replaced by him)
so keep trying your case who I assume is Mr Roberts himself behind all these first time posters

Reply
Comment_arrow

Kim L

8:37 pm on Friday, January 25, 2013

yes jean it's amazing how many first time posters we have in this city, that use the same sentence structures so worried about a few minutes worth of November fireworks

lyn

8:57 am on Saturday, January 26, 2013

Here's some info from the Ohio State Bar Association regarding Ohio law and fireworks:
https://www.ohiobar.org/forpublic/resources/lawyoucanuse/pages/lawyoucanuse-521.aspx

And more detailed in the actual Ohio Revised Code:
http://codes.ohio.gov/orc/3743
scroll down to 3743.54

Reply
Comment_arrow

lyn

9:21 am on Saturday, January 26, 2013

IMO, and it is just that, it appears that it has to be performed by a LICENSED exhibitor and there MUST be approval from the fire chief AND a police chief (or designee). But it doesn't look like the mayor has any say, unless the police chief were to say so, not the other way. Probably because these officials have the expertise in these matters more than a mayor would. So, how the mayor was able to do this - I don't know, but it left Dan in a position of relying on the power of his office.

Comment_arrow

lyn

9:35 am on Saturday, January 26, 2013

Unfortunately, if the mayor had said he needed the fire chiefs approval, this whole thing would have been avoided - because I assume the fire chief knows the regs and then this probably would not have proceeded, at least legally in Dan's mind.
But, I have to wonder about what Faith said above "We have approval from the Strongsville City Police Department and the Strongsville City Safety Director." Shouldn't the current police chief (if that is who she meant by the police dept.) and the Safety Director have known these regs and advised Dan? And isn't this safety director Mr. Goss who used to be our police chief and was just put in this newly created position after he retired?
I think it was more of the mayor THINKING he had the authority to do this, but others should have known so Dan would not be the one to be holding the bag.

tom m

12:26 pm on Saturday, January 26, 2013

holding what bag ?????? he is not being charged with anything ????? he is being sued by a neighbor, WHO if I am not mistaken has to show proof of damage caused from those little sparklers he was shooting off, and MR Grinch's own video which he was shooting from inside his house instead of having his dinner which was "ruined" he needs to prove his lawn was damaged and car and roof, which by the wind direction and distance from the house seems unlikely
everyone is so focused on permission or not permission of fireworks all this is is a childish lawsuit brought on by a unhappy person ...............who instead of joining his neighbors in a celebration "like he had done many times before" ....chose instead to hide in a dark room in his house and videotape what the rest of his neighbors were doing ........... this again is all about proof and how do you prove that 10 minutes worth of fireworks "ruined your dinner"

Reply
Comment_arrow

lyn

1:04 pm on Saturday, January 26, 2013

If it goes against him, which I sincerely hope it doesn't and doubt it will, hopefully the damages will be mitigated by the mayor and police giving permission. And, as a result, hopefully no further litigation will happen. This Kevin seems to want to cause trouble, and I don't think will be happy until his neighbor(s) pay either monetarily or by trying to embarrass them. But he is the one looking the fool here. Most people would think by asking a city official for permission and getting it, that it would be okay - but that doesn't always excuse , as they say, "ignorance of the law". Believe me, the only bad guy here, IMO, is Kevin - he was setting it up from the time he put this on video - couldn't wait to build a case that hadn't yet happened. And, as for the mayor, again, I think he believed he had the authority to give his OK. People do make mistakes, and so what, if no harm was done - and I don't think harm WAS done.

Comment_arrow

lyn

1:10 pm on Saturday, January 26, 2013

"holding the bag" was in reference to the police dept. and safety director who should know the law and therefore, should have followed proper procedures in the beginning and advised so Dan would not have been in this position to begin with.
sorry, I wasn't clear

Otis

2:41 pm on Saturday, January 26, 2013

With all of these evidence pictures, nobody posted Mr Roberts ruined Thanksgiving dinner. So here it is. https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTxo4oblTQqX3_1pgGG0RSHnvDYwbWvTovjQL_ap7_b1CDSNYpX

Reply

Otis

2:54 pm on Saturday, January 26, 2013

Nevermind I forgot about the picture of the burnt turkey. My bad.

Reply

Otis

5:31 pm on Tuesday, January 29, 2013

Well tomorrow is the big hearing and I would like to wish Dan and Faith Good Luck!

Reply
Comment_arrow

faith

7:59 am on Wednesday, January 30, 2013

There is so much more to this story than any of you think. In the interest of the impending case I will wait until AFTER court to inform the uninformed. But, trust me, I will.

Paul

1:01 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

Let’s put our emotions aside for a moment. It is against Ohio law for an individual who does not posses a license issued by the State Fire Marshal to set them off. Individuals who violate the fireworks law face first-degree misdemeanor criminal penalties.A first time offender can be sentenced to up to six months in jail and also fined up to $1,000.Subsequent conviction is a fifth-degree felony potentially punishable by a prison term of up to one year. I do not believe Mr. Hoag and possibly others would enjoy that. Even the most experienced licensed pyrotechnic display companies have experienced various degrees of failures during their events. Here are some facts.Number of injuries caused by fireworks in 2010 (8,600) Number of fires caused by fireworks in 2009 (18,000) Amount of direct property loss caused by fireworks in 2009 ($38 million). Please go to
http://www.cpsc.gov//PageFiles/108534/2011fwreport.pdf
http://www.usfa.fema.gov/citizens/focus/fireworks.shtm
https://www.ohiobar.org/forpublic/resources/lawyoucanuse/pages/lawyoucanuse-521.aspx
http://codes.ohio.gov/orc/3743
Hopefully this has educated those city officials who may have been involved with providing Mr. Hoag verbal permission to conduct his firework display.Keep in mind we all have a right to live in a neighborhood free from illegal activity. It is the responsibility of our city officials to ensure that this is the case to the maximum extent possible.Ignorance of a law is not an excuse for violating it.

Reply

lyn

7:38 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

This was a small claims suit, not a criminal one.
AND
More is involved here than setting off the fireworks. We all have learned from their day in court that Kevin Roberts has had an agenda for years - according to his own sister, her brother vowed to live in the Crown Point Parkway house, which originally belonged to their father, for the rest of his life "just so he can make the neighbors' lives as miserable as possible." And, it was also revealed that "Roberts' late father apparently began to dislike the lights and the crowds, to the point he was charged with cutting Hoag's electrical wires in about 2002." So, now the son has carried on the vendetta and can't let go of what ever brought this all about.

So, once the fireworks part is settled, do people really think this Kevin dude will be happy? I really don't think so. He just was able to use the fireworks and the legality of same to get back at him. But, this has also brought the mayor, safety director and police department scope of authority into question. As much as I'd like to say that the mayor should be able to authorize this, IMO, the Ohio Code is rather clear that the fire chief MUST have approved this. And, chances are, if he were asked to, or if the mayor had referred it to him, this activity would not have taken place because they did violate the code - again, IMO. Regardless of whether people think it is safe or not, there are restrictions.

Reply

tom m

10:35 am on Tuesday, March 5, 2013

FIREWORKS CASE SETTLED
Well it's about time!

From Fox 8 News

BEREA, Ohio– A judge has dismissed a man’s claim that his neighbor’s fireworks display ruined his Thanksgiving dinner.

However, the judge did rule that the neighbor must pay the man cleanup costs from the fireworks debris that fell on his property.

Kevin Roberts of Strongsville sued his next door neighbor, Daniel Hoag, after he claims a fireworks display this past Thanksgiving ruined his holiday dinner.

The lawsuit claimed fireworks debris fell on Roberts’ home and yard, and a family member suffered emotional distress from the crowds of people blocking the driveway to watch the display.

Monday, a judge ordered Hoag to pay just more than $300, plus court costs and interest, to the plaintiff for the cleanup costs.

But the judge threw out the claims for emotional distress and spoiling Thanksgiving dinner.

Hoag said he has received a tremendous outpouring of support and donations and the money left over after the settlement will be given to charity.

I believe the court should pay the interest for taking so long to make it's decision.

Reply

Leave a comment