I am hearing a lot of talk and emotional tugs at the heartstrings during this teacher strike debate claiming that the teachers of the Strongsville School District "deserve more" in both pay and benefits because of their tenure, degree, etc.
Looking at the reality of the situation, that is just completely untrue.
Allow me to explain. First, you don't "deserve" anything because you have a degree or because you have been an employee somewhere for a certain duration of time. No one shook your hand at handed you a diploma saying "Now you are guaranteed employment and a salary that you feel is commesurate with your education." Nope. If you were told that and actually believed it, you might be just a tad too naive for this world.
Long ago, I had bartending friends who had law degrees and one was a graduate of medical school. They needed money to pay rent, buy groceries, etc. They did not go knocking on potential employers doors telling them how intelligent they were and how they "deserved" more money than what they were making at the bar. They did what they had to do given the current economic circumstance. You can tell yourself that you are underpaid all you want, but if there's no one willing (or able) to pay you the amount you are asking for, what's the point?
Tenure. The thought of increasing an employee's rate of pay solely based on the amount of time that employee has worked at a company is contrary to all rational thought for efficiency in running a business, yet we allow many teacher's unions to implement tenure systems within our public schools. I'm sorry, but I don't care if you have been at my company for 20 years or 10 days, if you are not an efficient, reliable employee that performs their agreed upon duties consistently on a daily basis, I'm looking elsewhere and you should start getting your resume ready. This is a system that breeds inefficiency. You can dispute it all you want, but if you remove incentive from people, they will only perform at a level to meet the minimum requirements.
Think of the redistribution of grades analogy that students previously perfomed at their college. They interviewed fellow students and asked them if they believed in redistribution of wealth. Most said yes. It sounds good. Many said things such as "what do rich people need all that money for" or "they have enough to spread around to people who need it more," etc. Okay...but what about when that rule is applied to their grades?
So when those same interviewers then asked them: Would you be open to a system where grades are redistributed based on need? Ex: If there is a student with a 4.0 GPA and a student who commutes and works 2 jobs and is pulling a 2.6 GPA. They were asked "would you be willing as the 4.0 student to 'redistribute' some of your gpa to a more 'needy' student since you have an 'excessive' GPA?"
The resounding answer was a flat "NO WAY!" Why? The same reasons citizens want to keep more of their own money and give less to taxes: We earned it!
Taxpayers feel the same way. We value where are money is spent. We want to ensure it is being allocated in the most efficient way possible. We value our teachers and want them to be paid on the merit of their individual performance. Right now, that is not the case in the Strongsville City School District, nor is it even possible with the current evaluation system.
Here's a quote from Cory Shaffer's article at Cleveland.com: "The teachers union argues that its members haven't had a raise since 2008, and agreed to pay 10 percent of their health insurance premiums, capped at $150 a month for families and $75 for individuals."
Ok. Let that sink in for a second. Let's talk about the health insurance premiums and what's not mentioned here, the pension.
I know that our nation's President talked about how our health care premiums would be going down on average of $2500.00, but as anyone with a pulse can see, that's not gonna happen. Sally Pipes, President, CEO, and Taube Fellow in Health Care Studies at the Pacific Research Institute, explained it this way in a recent article in Forbes:
"...health insurance isn’t any cheaper. In fact, it’s more expensive. Premiums have increased by an average of $3,065. And they’re about to go up even more, as Obamacare takes effect during the president’s second term.
At the end of 2012, Mark Bertolini, the CEO of Aetna, the third-largest health insurer in the country, warned that many consumers would face “premium rate shock” with the advent of Obamacare’s major insurance regulations in 2014. He predicted that unsubsidized premiums would rise 20 to 50 percent, on average.
For some people, premiums would double. “We’re going to see some markets go up as much as 100 percent,” Bertolini told Bloomberg News."
Now, Strongsville teachers and supporters, after reading the information above, please tell us again how paying a maxiumum of $150 per month (family) and $75 per month (individual) for outstanding medical coverage is "unfair?" Do you even want to see our medical costs, that we, by the way, must fund fully on our own?
And we haven't even started talking about your pensions yet. Those are fully funded with Strongsville tax payer dollars.
Do you really have the gall to tell us that you've "made concessions?" Do you really feel it's "fair" to ask another citizen to fully fund their own pension and healthcare and on top of that, also be obligated to fund your entire pension and 90% of your health care costs?
If you say yes, then it's time for a reality check.
There's no money left to give. The system is unsustainable as it is currently set up. The Strongsville City School's own press release states:
"If the Strongsville City Schools continued down its current path, projected deficits are $1.1 million for 2014, $4.6 million for 2015 and $10.8 million for 2016," the release said. "We presented a contract proposal that reflects the economic reality of these difficult fiscal times."
Key word: REALITY. These extraordinary liabilities are literally devouring the school district's budget each year and obviously, based on the numbers above, will continue to do so until there is change in how teacher's pensions and health care premiums are funded.
Since many seem to disregard all facts of the current economic situation of the school district, I think it would be a good idea to try something new. I took a look at some of the publicly posted teachers salaries, names, etc (all are a matter of public record and are listed on the Ohio State Treasurers website).
I thought it would be interesting to see if all of these rumors about "five year pay freezes" and "unfair benefits" were true.
Uh, there not.
Below is information that is a public record and available on the State Treasurer's website. In no way shape or form is this meant to be a witch hunt whatsoever, nor would I ever in my life condone such behavior. The names and salaries are a matter of public record and are there if you want to see them, just go to the website and search for your school.
This is simply an attempt to get people to do some homework and log onto a site that is completely available to the viewing public and start understanding not only where our tax dollars go, how fairly our teachers ARE being compensated, and have the information to use your own ability to discern fact from fiction. This is all public information that any person can look up at any time, unfortunately though, most do not have any idea exactly how their teachers are being compensated.
All information below is taken directly from the Ohio State Treasurers website: http://www.tos.ohio.gov/teacher_salary
If this information contains errors, the OH State Treasurers website has a disclaimer on the homepage as to where those errors occured. I am only publishing what is publicly available, not heresay.
2012 school year details are not posted on this site as of yet.
I thought since the SEA's own public spokesperson was so adamantly telling our residents how the teachers deserve better, why don't we take a look at how she's been compensated by the city's tax dollars:
Name: Christine Canning
School District: Strongsville City
School: Allen Elementary School
Salary (not including benefits):
2011: $54,975.00 Days worked: 184
2010: $53,008.00 Days worked: 184
2009: $48,860.00 Days worked: 184
2008: $38,228.00 Days worked: 184
2007: $37,026.00 Days worked: 185
Est. Current taxpayer funded portion of health care: 90% of health care premium
Est. Current Taxpayer funded portion of Pension: 100%
I applaud Ms. Canning's work if her pay raises were merit based. However, this shows you that the propaganda being spread about "pay freezes over the past five years" is 100% untrue. Ms. Canning's pay increased each year that was listed on the state treasurers website, and the it was approximately a 48.5% increase in salary from 2007 compared to 2011 (equating to an additional salary increase of $17,949.00). We must also know that this salary does not factor in health care premium coverage by tax payers nor taxpayer pension funding.
Again, my goal here in particular is to simply point out false statements, not to say what she "deserves." If there has been a pay freeze for the past five years, which is the rumor that is going around every message board, please explain how the above numbers possibly work to prove that?
Ms. Canning had plenty to say about how the Board spends our tax dollars in a February 27th article from Cleveland.com titled "Strongsville School Board: Behavior of Teachers Shows Strike is 'Inevitable.'"
"It's no surprise David Frazee believes a strike is inevitable when he has yet to come to the table and reign in an out of control attorney who is profiteering from a crisis of his own making," Canning said. "Rather than spending money on teachers and students of their the district, the board is negligibly wasting taxpayer dollars on hiring security goons and unqualified replacement workers."
I'm not an accountant, but I'm pretty sure that if we took the dollars spent on hiring security and substitute teachers, we would barely put a dent in the amount of unfunded pension/health care liabilities that face our school district right now and continue to loom over us for the upcoming school year. Large credit card bills don't go away by making minimum payments and putting it off until next time.
Hope our kids are learning better math than this in school.
-Myron

lyn
3:16 pm on Thursday, February 28, 2013
WOW!
I'm so glad you decided to write a blog!!
Myron Shibley
4:14 pm on Thursday, February 28, 2013
TY
GS MOM
5:10 pm on Thursday, February 28, 2013
Excellent! Loved everyone of your posts also!
Myron Shibley
6:31 pm on Thursday, February 28, 2013
TY GS mom.
Tina Lewis Kozarik
7:35 pm on Thursday, February 28, 2013
Very nice, Myron.
Myron Shibley
7:38 pm on Thursday, February 28, 2013
Thanks...and YES...I know there are a few typos. I was running on fumes, so cut me some slack :)
Myron Shibley
7:42 pm on Thursday, February 28, 2013
Yes Tom?
Myron Shibley
8:00 pm on Thursday, February 28, 2013
I made it clear that I do not have a problem with private sector unions. That is their right. I do have a problem w public sector unions but i did not go into detail in my blog.
My only problem is forcing employees that do not wish to be a part of any union to pay agency fees. If you want to organize, so be it...but you do not call the shots on who can come in and you certainly should not be able to tell fellow employees who do not desire your representation that they must still pay you fees either way.
I don't understand why people think it is "union bashing." I am simply saying to make membership voluntary. No one said you couldn't organize. Why is that so "threatening" if so many people "need" your representation? That's all I am asking.
I am including any union bc why should the expectations be different between an auto worker and a teacher for the point I am arguing above. I am not saying union members are evil people. I am saying that it is wrong to force another employee who does not want your representation, benefits, etc to still pay fees to your union. Just bc you unionize, doesn't mean you are now the "employer."
Myron Shibley
8:02 pm on Thursday, February 28, 2013
And if I'm wrong on this point... Why do unions fight so hard to resist voluntary membership?
tom m
8:15 pm on Thursday, February 28, 2013
took to other blog since this blog i agree with 100%
Myron Shibley
8:10 pm on Thursday, February 28, 2013
Btw...my blog days are done...at least for now. You guys are free to write anything and everything you wish at anytime. So if you want to do a blog on schools, by all means, please do...I'm sure it will be educational for all visiting the site. Time for me to get back to work though...I said what I wanted to say. I appreciate compliments and I do also appreciate those who disagree but took time to read.
Tad Taderson
9:51 pm on Thursday, February 28, 2013
Justine,
What if Myron is a private sector employee? If so, his employer pays him and knows what he makes. Public sector employees are paid by the public and their salaries are available to the public because of it. In particular, if a Public Sector employee, who Myron pays their salary, makes themselves the face of a movement (through public comments), then they are open to active critique.
Do you get the difference? If you don't, you aren't worth debating.
If you don't contribute to Myron's salary, pension and retirement, its none of your business. If you do...feel free to chime in. But, you don't, so take a back seat and let the adults talk.
The Facts
11:44 am on Saturday, March 2, 2013
Enough with this "I pay your salary so I get to decide etc. etc." nonsense.
You do not pay their salaries. You pay your taxes. The City pays their salaries. There is a distinction between these two things, but I can't see the deep thinkers on this thread being able to quite grasp that distinction.
What do you do when you get pulled over? Shout down the police officer giving you a ticket by telling them "I pay your salary!" Ha, I'd love to see you try that.
Myron Shibley
9:54 pm on Thursday, February 28, 2013
Boom.
lyn
10:03 pm on Thursday, February 28, 2013
Want to know any other teacher salaries?
Here are 2 sites you can check - but remember to add 10% to these figures, that's the benefit OUR district teachers get (we are about 1 of the 29 in 619 or so in the state who do things this way - only 3 in the Cleveland area).
http://www.tos.ohio.gov/teacher_salary
http://buckeyeinstitute.org/teacher-salary
lyn
10:10 pm on Thursday, February 28, 2013
Here's another one...
Strongsville Education Association President, Tracy Linscott
$74,348.00 - 2007,2008
$80,869.00 - 2009,10,11
(per first site listed above)
Add 10% to that, and you'll get her true effective salary for 185/184 days (8.5 months)
James Murphy
10:12 pm on Thursday, February 28, 2013
agreed
Tad Taderson
10:33 pm on Thursday, February 28, 2013
You want my name and salary? Answer this question first...do you pay my salary, health care or pension? No...then...none of your business.
Do you really not get the difference?
Do you have outrage over public company financials which contains the compensation of Directors and Officers? How about the Sunday PD Business section which shows insider transactions.
You want my salary, throw some numbers to the left of your comma...then you're in my ballpark.
Myron Shibley
10:51 pm on Thursday, February 28, 2013
Haha. Uhh...I believe there are a LOT more people reading the business pages (with same information posted) than "Mr. Shibley's blog." Wow.
Myron Shibley
10:38 pm on Thursday, February 28, 2013
What exactly are you proving by doing this? You are a private sector employee...no one has the right to know your wages, pay, etc. as you are not compensated with tax payer dollars. You should stop now while you're behind. No one else is dumb enough to join in this game.
That's after taxes right?
Justine Travis
10:51 pm on Thursday, February 28, 2013
Funny you admonish me for listing my earnings and then ask "after taxes right"? You went too far and you should be ashamed. You are no better than the teachers you criticize.
Myron Shibley
10:40 pm on Thursday, February 28, 2013
btw...the whole double-dog dare you, reverse psychology game doesn't work that well unless you are a kid or Marty McFly.
Tad Taderson
10:52 pm on Thursday, February 28, 2013
Justine, Justine, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.
Myron Shibley
10:55 pm on Thursday, February 28, 2013
I point out facts. People sometimes don't like the truth. No apologies offered...and definitely no shame felt on my end. Good luck Justine...you'll need it.
Tad Taderson
11:01 pm on Thursday, February 28, 2013
Justine,
I will have a good night knowing at least one person in this city is compensated fairly based on their intelligence.
Myron Shibley
11:32 pm on Thursday, February 28, 2013
The Taddersons own more miles across the Midwest than your 2004 Chevy Aveo has probably ever driven. They are very wealthy people...dont be envious. Why are you so concerned with publicizing your salary and then demanding everyone else do the same? I will tell you this...your annual salary would not cover my monthly yard maintenance costs of my properties. Is that enough for you to start to get the hint? i commend you for working but you gotta take it easy on here w this obsession of knowing everyone's salary. Believe me, your only gonna get more upset.
Myron Shibley
12:09 am on Friday, March 1, 2013
No, it was public information and she brought attention to herself by making the claim no unionized teacher had received a raise since 2008. So, I looked at http://www.tos.ohio.gov/teacher_salary and fact checked her. Sorry you were unhappy with the results not being in her favor. Maybe I will keep blogging teachers salaries each day of strike until its over. Won't take long...just a quick post every day for all to see. Would you be willing to help me gather the data from the states website? You would be handsomely compensated.
lyn
8:00 am on Friday, March 1, 2013
Yes, please don't quit posting your blog altogether.
And maybe just a short "thought of the day" to go along with 1 or 2 featured teachers. Then the readers can judge for themselves if they are over or underpaid, and if they should still have their 10% retirement paid for them, like has been happening for about 20 years. Imagine the amount of money they have saved by not having to contribute THEIR own part over all these years.
lyn
7:02 pm on Friday, March 1, 2013
Myron -
Also check the school roster to make sure they are still employed, since these teachers say the sites list some that no longer work there.
Myron Shibley
12:11 am on Friday, March 1, 2013
By doing so, you also would give yourself an outside shot of once again being in good graces with the Taddersons. Very powerful people.
Tad Taderson
8:10 am on Friday, March 1, 2013
Justine,
Your outrage over Myron posting public information, in a public forum puzzles me. Let's put that aside for a moment...are you outraged over public employees flat out lying (saying they have not gotten any raises over 5 years). If a public employee lies in a public forum about that, as a means to secure addition/above market compensation, which the tax payers provide, isn't that a disgusting tactic? Are you outraged over that?
You are naive.
Dennis
9:19 am on Friday, March 1, 2013
Very well written. Thank you!
Myron Shibley
7:51 pm on Saturday, March 2, 2013
you're welcome Dennis...thank you.
Mary Jo Naegele Skavdahl
11:18 am on Friday, March 1, 2013
So, if our computations are correct, Strongsville pays $69,000,000 (minus those on individual; this is based on family) total for health insurance for the whole district per family insured. Or, $18,000 per year per family insured. Or, $1,500 per family insured.
SvilleRes
1:16 pm on Friday, March 1, 2013
JAMES MURPHY, you said up above that you believe the teachers are worth every penny of the $80,000, but that you simply believe they should pay for their own benefits. Based on the average of working 184 days, that equates to 1400 hours, based on an 8 hour work day. I'm being generous on the hours because we're talking salary, not hourly employees. They like to say they work a lot more than that, as do many other professions. But, that is what you sign up for as a salaried professional, and the hours don't matter as a salaried employee so we base the work day off of an 8 hour day.
Other professions work 2,000 hours a year. So, teachers work 70% of other professions. If we extrapolate their income out to compare apples to apples (by multiplying 80,000 x 1.3 to add that 30%, for anyone trying to figure out where I got my numbers from), they are really making the equivalent of $104,000. This puts them above CPAs, financial planners, and engineers as far as average wage in the Cleveland market and at least in line with attorneys, who work a lot more hours on average. Does that seem out of skew to you?
tom m
5:04 pm on Friday, March 1, 2013
SvilleRes your numbers are solid ...........But I believe James works at ford ..............he probably makes $95k screwing on door handles.... so the above question might not apply
James Murphy
7:55 pm on Friday, March 1, 2013
sville my comment is based on all area teachers in the suburbs that are in the same pay scale and qualifications currently make 80k so the number is not the issue the issue is the 10.2% pension payment that these teachers enjoy
the school board if what I understand to be the truth is the board wants to cancel this payment and replace it with a 9.2% raise spread out over the contract making the teachers once again be responsible for their own pension payment
the teachers will NEVER agree to this (actually fair offer)
this is a loss in income and with the added raise the top scale teachers would now be making 87k per year so when their next contract ended they would still be in the highest paid group of teachers going into the next contract negotiations
and tom my salary as a blue collar worker is between myself and my co-workers BUT to show the teachers why they are wrong We ford employees have given the company many many concessions over the last few years FOR THE SAKE OF THE COMPANIES HEALTH
The Facts
11:18 am on Saturday, March 2, 2013
Yeah, teachers live high on the hog. Just go look at the luxury vehicles in the staff parking lots.
lyn
11:32 am on Saturday, March 2, 2013
"luxury vehicles in the staff parking lots."
YEP!
lyn
11:33 am on Saturday, March 2, 2013
At the board meeting.
SvilleRes
1:25 pm on Friday, March 1, 2013
When I look at the pressure and responsibility involved in the positions of CPAs, financial planners, engineers and attorneys (as examples), I do not believe a teacher's salary as career field should meet or exceed those fields, generally speaking. The additional liability factor alone involved in those positions makes a huge difference. And, to the teachers, I'm not talking about criminal liability (as in, responsibility for the care of the children). I'm talking about the daily pressure of liability of making a mistake. Even a mistake in those jobs opens the person up to potential liability. Teachers have a more administrative or supportive role in that regard. The school district and its higher ups have the weight of those decisions, not the teachers. So, to me those salaries are out of skew.
Please understand. This is no disrespect to teachers. They ARE truly valuable to me. I'm merely discussing economics. Thanks.
The Facts
11:19 am on Saturday, March 2, 2013
Since their salaries don't exceed those, then what are you talking about? We can extrapolate all day about what they make the equivalent of but teachers don't take home anything like what you're quoting.
jabace
3:07 pm on Friday, March 1, 2013
Awesome article. Perfectly said. I agree 100%
Myron Shibley
7:52 pm on Saturday, March 2, 2013
Thank you!
jabace
3:20 pm on Friday, March 1, 2013
Myron for President!
Myron Shibley
4:46 pm on Friday, March 1, 2013
TY. I'm running for pres of SEA next year...Kim thinking there will prob be an opening.
The Facts
11:00 am on Saturday, March 2, 2013
Myron, you haven't a clue what this teacher went through to get those raises. There are raises and there are step increases that are structured based around the degrees and certifications and duties of the teacher. Do you know how much of that salary you're posting is a stipend for extracurriculars? Do you know how much of it is because she received additional training? Do you know if she took on extra duties? Do you know if she got her master's degree during this period? No, you don't know any of these things, but you come on here and speculate wildly in absence of facts, like most of your posts on the patch.
At this point, teachers in Ohio are required to have a master's degree. As these take between one and two years to accomplish (if you're going full-time), this means that teachers are among 7.95% of the population of America. And they have to continue to advance their education, by law, getting additional college credit as the years go by. That they pay for out of pocket.
This puts teachers on a parity with lawyers and doctors and high-level engineers for educational attainment. Yet you seem to think that they shouldn't be paid anything for this and should merely be willing to do this for what you could get paid as a janitor with a high school diploma.
You seem intent on trashing teachers and wrecking your community. I leave it to others to determine why.
Myron Shibley
11:08 am on Saturday, March 2, 2013
I'm tired of repeating myself...so I'll let Willy do my talking for me. http://qkme.me/3t7h8n
The Facts
11:11 am on Saturday, March 2, 2013
So basically, what you're saying is you have no argument. That's fine.
lyn
11:18 am on Saturday, March 2, 2013
"teachers on a parity with lawyers and doctors and high-level engineers"
Now I now you are a teacher and you are full of it
I'm done with you, you are so out of touch!!
The Facts
11:50 am on Saturday, March 2, 2013
Sorry lyn, I'm not a teacher.
lyn
11:54 am on Saturday, March 2, 2013
Yeah-
You're just that "THING" Tracy
lyn
11:56 am on Saturday, March 2, 2013
Just as I thought.
The Facts
12:07 pm on Saturday, March 2, 2013
lyn, wrong again. Do you ever tire of being wrong?
Tad Taderson
11:03 am on Saturday, March 2, 2013
Is $80K a year with unmatched benefits a bad compensation package? Some people are suggesting they deserve more.
There are a ton of people working in non-profit, with advanced degrees, that make a lot less than that.
On top of it, the money has run out. We can't just print more and hope the problem goes away.
The Facts
11:09 am on Saturday, March 2, 2013
Strongsville residents need to realize something every time they complain about where their tax dollars are going. You pay one of the lowest rates of any community in the area.
Here are the numbers:
http://treasurer.cuyahogacounty.us/pdf_treasurer/en-US/2012_CommercialTaxRates.pdf
Of the 80 communities listed in this, only 11 have a lower tax rate than Strongsville. You like to think of yourselves as a rich district but you cry like babies every time they want to raise taxes by $20 a month to balance your school district's books. That's not how rich people act.
The truth is, you live very well for very cheap, and sooner or later things have to be paid for. Adults recognize this and step up. Children throw tantrums and try to look around for an enemy they can blame and attack.
That's your story in a nutshell, Myron.
lyn
11:16 am on Saturday, March 2, 2013
And we are not going to pay for any more in taxes if its going to the teachers.
To build a middle school - yes. You -NO WAY!!!
The Facts
11:51 am on Saturday, March 2, 2013
Then you can pat yourself on the back when you drive down the school ratings and the property values and go into a lovely little economic spiral.
lyn
11:54 am on Saturday, March 2, 2013
I'll be happy when we have some new blood in the schools that I can support.
The Facts
12:08 pm on Saturday, March 2, 2013
lyn, when you drive down the salaries of the teachers, you won't get the same level of teachers and your fresh blood will be those who couldn't get a job in another higher paying district. Good luck with that. Hope you can stay competitive, but with that mindset, it'll be tough.
Myron Shibley
11:22 am on Saturday, March 2, 2013
Thank you for the summation of every one of my posts into your one single post. I love "we live very well for cheap." Because that single figure sums up every cost of our lives. There are no other expenditures that a resident of this city is responsible for whatsoever. Maybe you are forgetting that, among many other things, on top of funding your ENTIRE pension and 90% of your healthcare premiums, we also have to take care of our own as well...plus we have to have another 6.2% removed from our checks in SS that you do not. You are truly a moron. And it's so funny listening to people like you cry as if you have it "so bad." If you think WE live well, what the hell do you call 75K/yr + 7600/yr in tax payer provided pension + near zero healthcare costs, no SS payment (6.2%), almost 100% job security and all for only 184 days a year?
That, my friend, is your sad, pathetic violin solo summed up in a nutshell. Good luck getting anyone other than teachers to join your pity party once they see the real numbers.
The Facts
11:52 am on Saturday, March 2, 2013
Myron, I'm glad to see that you are willing to have a mature debate by calling people names. No wonder you hate teachers, you clearly didn't learn anything in school about how to effectively argue or how to respect your opponents.
Have I called you any names? No. Have I done anything other than present my arguments here? No. Yet between you and lyn, it seems that you wish to drive down the quality of debate on *your* article. Bravo.
The Facts
11:58 am on Saturday, March 2, 2013
And as I've stated elsewhere, I'm not a teacher, so you're not funding any pension of mine.
Two decades ago, the Strongsville BOE, instead of giving their teachers raises, chose to instead pay the retirement benefits. That was their decision. So you can complain about it all you want, but that didn't come from the teachers. The BOE thought they were getting a bargain at the time and that was their choice.
Now you want to beat up teachers for decisions your board made. Well, that's just shooting the wrong person for what you see as a crime.
The truth is, Strongsville teachers have made concessions year in and year out and the BOE has asked for more and more and made the process more and more acrimonious. If only one side is making any concessions, then you see where the aggressor is in the debate.
Look around at other communities and see if they have this level of rancor. It's not there. It's because of hostile, angry individuals like yourselves vote in these rotten board members then cry bloody murder if there's ever a levy, even a replacement levy, on the ballot.
lyn
12:12 pm on Saturday, March 2, 2013
That was then.
Now the teachers need to pay their own share - economic times have changed and the teachers need to adjust as others have had to. Its as simple as that.
They should be happy to negotiate this point - it will probably be ruled illegal for a district to fund an employees share when SB5 is rewritten and enacted. That WAS in SB5. So, it would be plain stupid for the teachers to not plan on this happening. Otherwise, they'll be stuck with it anyhow. And, the teachers can cry about how they gave this up - poor pathetic teachers, like I wouldn't know it.
Myron Shibley
11:37 am on Saturday, March 2, 2013
Hey, just saw this has 100 FB recommendations...uh-oh...that's a lot of people now that can see the real numbers. Might not help gain any sympathizers, huh?
The Facts
12:01 pm on Saturday, March 2, 2013
Oh look, here's the fabulous proposal that the Strongsville BOE has put out:
http://www.strongnet.org/cms/lib6/OH01000884/Centricity/Domain/1/Proposed-Agreement.pdf
lyn
12:06 pm on Saturday, March 2, 2013
HA-HA
Agree to show your proposal and then the taxpayer can see the BOE's as well. It requires both parties to agree.
What's wrong - still busy cleaning it up so you don't look bad???
The Facts
12:11 pm on Saturday, March 2, 2013
lyn, the Board is busy cleaning up their proposal. That's what's really going on. I'm sure the teachers would have been willing to show their proposals a long time ago. The intransigence in these debates is coming entirely from the BOE. Believe what you want, but you're wrong.